Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7398565
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T03:53:08+00:00 2026-05-29T03:53:08+00:00

For reasons that I’m so far completely unable to decipher, I’m no longer able

  • 0

For reasons that I’m so far completely unable to decipher, I’m no longer able to use ActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess anymore.

The relevant part of model looks like this:

class Item < ActiveRecord::Base
  serialize :metadata, ActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess

(I added the option to try and force it along, but it hasn’t helped. Previously this was all working fine, and I didn’t have that there.)

For as long as the object is in memory, everything works fine. It’s correctly a HashWithIndifferentAccess, and life is good. Once it gets saved to the database, it’s saved as a Hash instead:

mysql> select * from items;
+----+------+-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------+
| id | link | text        | metadata                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | category_id |
+----+------+-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------+
|  1 | NULL | Apple Store | ---
id: 42cc7080f964a520e9251fe3
name: Apple Store
contact:
  phone: '4153920202'
  formattedPhone: (415) 392-0202
location:
  address: 1 Stockton St.
  crossStreet: at Ellis St.
  lat: '37.78573590563453'
  lng: '-122.40610713227913'
  distance: '1784'
  postalCode: '94108'
  city: San Francisco
  state: CA
  country: USA
categories:
  '0':
    id: 4bf58dd8d48988d122951735
    name: Electronics Store
    pluralName: Electronics Stores
    shortName: Electronics
    icon: https://foursquare.com/img/categories/shops/technology.png
    parents:
    - Shops & Services
    primary: 'true'
verified: 'false'
stats:
  checkinsCount: '30462'
  usersCount: '16105'
  tipCount: '128'
url: http://apple.com/sanfrancisco
hereNow:
  count: '7'
 | 1           |
+----+------+-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------+

Which means it can’t be coerced back into a HashWithIndifferentAccess and things blow up like this:

ActiveRecord::SerializationTypeMismatch in Index#index

Showing /development/lists.io/website/app/views/users/_todo.html.haml where line #7 raised:

Attribute was supposed to be a ActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess, but was a Hash

This is using Rails 3.1.3, storing the data in MySQL using the mysql2 gem version 0.3.10. I’m running ruby 1.9.2p290 as well. I can add anymore information that anyone would deem helpful, but I’m at a loss as to how to debug this further.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T03:53:08+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 3:53 am

    1.9.2 normally includes Psych as the YAML library. However, libyaml is an external dependency, and 1.9.2 defaults to using Syck (the old library) if libyaml is not available when Ruby is compiled: link

    The fact that Psych YAML-izes ActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess as a standard hash is an oustanding issue on Psych’s Github. Seems to be fixed in 1.9.3 though.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Any reasons that I should or should not use Oracle JRE 7 in production?
I was downgraded from Vista to XP for reasons that are not relevant. I
What are the reasons that can motivate a programmer to use Java JMS (Java
For reasons that we won't discuss, I have determined that MAMP is a pile
For reasons that are irrelevant to this question I'll need to run several SQLite
For reasons that only the developers can understand, Firefox will create and open .url
For reasons that I would not like to discuss, our master database schema is
What are the most common reasons that I would be getting this error from
I would like to know the reasons that we do refactoring and justify it.
In Release It! , Michael Nygard reasons that many catastrophic system failures are often

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.