Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 153547
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T09:49:12+00:00 2026-05-11T09:49:12+00:00

For some reason I have only the linker map for an application I am

  • 0

For some reason I have only the linker map for an application I am debugging. There is a crash log which says crash occurred at offset ‘myApp.exe! + 4CA24’.

From the linker map I am able to locate the method. Say this is at offset ‘myApp.exe! + 4BD7C’.

Is there anyway to figure out the exact line in source code using just the above info?

I know if we have a .cod file it makes it very easy, but I don’t have one (and can’t create).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T09:49:13+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:49 am

    The best you can do if you only have MAP-files is to study the EXE-file in a disassembler and compare to constructs that you recognize from the common ways the compiler generates code. These you have to learn. That means learning at least some assembler is required. This is good knowledge that will help you in the future, especially if you have to debug a lot of code.

    A slightly simpler approach is to download the free Intel-books on processor instructions and simply check out their sizes. This way you can count your way to the faulting instruction. For best results the two methods should be used in conjunction with each other.

    Typically what you’d be looking for is something that looks a bit like this:

    mov DWORD PTR [edi+40], eax 

    (Instruction, register, offset, size and order can be different but indirection is typically where most code crashes)

    Whatever you do you should seriously consider turning on COD-file generation for the future as that makes it super-easy to find the faulting line.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.