Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 806159
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T00:12:01+00:00 2026-05-15T00:12:01+00:00

For some reason when I sort this query by DESC it’s super fast, but

  • 0

For some reason when I sort this query by DESC it’s super fast, but if sorted by ASC it’s extremely slow.

This takes about 150 milliseconds:

SELECT posts.id
FROM posts USE INDEX (published)
WHERE posts.feed_id IN ( 4953,622,1,1852,4952,76,623,624,10 )
ORDER BY posts.published DESC
LIMIT 0, 50;

This takes about 32 seconds:

SELECT posts.id
FROM posts USE INDEX (published)
WHERE posts.feed_id IN ( 4953,622,1,1852,4952,76,623,624,10 )
ORDER BY posts.published ASC
LIMIT 0, 50;

The EXPLAIN is the same for both queries.

id  select_type table   type    possible_keys   key key_len ref rows    Extra
1   SIMPLE  posts   index   NULL    published   5   NULL    50  Using where

I’ve tracked it down to “USE INDEX (published)”. If I take that out it’s the same performance both ways. But the EXPLAIN shows the query is less efficient overall.

id  select_type table   type    possible_keys   key key_len ref rows    Extra
1   SIMPLE  posts   range   feed_id feed_id 4   \N  759 Using where; Using filesort

And here’s the table.

CREATE TABLE `posts` (
  `id` int(20) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `feed_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `post_url` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
  `title` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
  `content` blob,
  `author` varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL,
  `published` int(12) DEFAULT NULL,
  `updated` datetime NOT NULL,
  `created` datetime NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  UNIQUE KEY `post_url` (`post_url`,`feed_id`),
  KEY `feed_id` (`feed_id`),
  KEY `published` (`published`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=196530 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

Is there a fix for this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T00:12:02+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:12 am

    Your index is sorted desc so when you ask for ascending it needs to do a lot more work to bring it back in that order

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

For some reason I never see this done. Is there a reason why not?
For some reason, Section 1 works but Section 2 does not. When run in
For some reason when I attempt to make a request to an Ajax.net web
For some reason when I create a new namespace in Visual Studio 2008 its
For some reason, when I try to install SQL Server 2008 Express , I
For some reason, lately the *.UDL files on many of my client systems are
For some reason beyond me I can't access the mysql server on a machine.
For some reason the Windows command prompt is special in that you have to
For some reason after I installed Boot Camp, my os x terminal started to
For some reason, no matter how I go about it, I cannot get TortoiseSVN

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.