Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 244647
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T21:01:20+00:00 2026-05-11T21:01:20+00:00

For unit testing purposes I’m trying to write a mock object of a class

  • 0

For unit testing purposes I’m trying to write a mock object of a class with no constructors.

Is this even possible in Java, of is the class simply not extensible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T21:01:20+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:01 pm

    A class with no constructors has an implicit public no-argument constructor and yes, as long as it’s not final, it can be sub-classed.

    If the class has only private constructors then no, it can’t.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Im trying to unit test a class in some Java code that I've inherited.
I am trying to inegerate Google Toolbox for mac for unit testing purposes on
For the purposes of unit testing I'd like to create an iPhone project target
I use Eclipse + Maven and - for unit testing purposes - the web
How can I mock a DataServiceQuery for unit testing purpose? Long Details follow: Imagine
I have been trying to get the hang of TDD and unit testing (in
For the purposes of unit testing, I would like to validate that two xml
For unit testing purposes: Im searching for testing framework like NUnit that can validate
For learning purposes, I dived into the field of unit testing. I've read through
Unit testing and ASP.NET web applications are an ambiguous point in my group. More

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.