Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6872241
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T03:54:10+00:00 2026-05-27T03:54:10+00:00

For what design reason is there no sizeof operator in Java? Knowing that it

  • 0

For what design reason is there no sizeof operator in Java? Knowing that it is very useful in C++ and C#, how can you get the size of a certain type if needed?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T03:54:10+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 3:54 am

    Because the size of primitive types is explicitly mandated by the Java language. There is no variance between JVM implementations.

    Moreover, since allocation is done by the new operator depending on its argument there is no need to specify the amount of memory needed.

    It would sure be convenient sometimes to know how much memory an object will take so you could estimate things like max heap size requirements but I suppose the Java Language/Platform designers did not think it was a critical aspect.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any design reason for that (like the reason they gave up multi
This should be a very basic design question, but for some reason it doesn't
Is there a reason why I can't perform an Include to include a collection
Is there any reason that the ctype facet functions ( is , scan_is ,
Does anyone know if there was a specific reason or design decision to not
Is there any reason why ActionLinks aren't rendered by the VWD 2008 design view?
How can I get the (physical) installed path of a DLL that is (may
Is there some idiomatic, performance or design philosophy reason why C#'s LinkedList's RemoveFirst() and
Is there a reason that ServletRequest.getRemoteAddr() returns the clients ip address as a string
Design patterns are usually related to object oriented design. Are there design patterns for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.