Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 763169
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T16:31:02+00:00 2026-05-14T16:31:02+00:00

Fortran->Algol->Cpl->Bcpl->C->C++->Java ….. Seems like every language is built upon an ancestor language. My question

  • 0

Fortran->Algol->Cpl->Bcpl->C->C++->Java …..

Seems like every language is built upon an ancestor language.
My question : New languages extend parent ones or there is some kind of a trick?

e.g. System.out.print() in Java ; is it actually printf() in C, and so on (printf is actually .. in Cpl)?

If so, doesn’t this make every further language be slower and need more memory? What separates a new language from a framework?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T16:31:03+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 4:31 pm

    Each language builds on the concepts of another (language design). Each new language learns what worked in previous languages and what did not work. Also languages are targeted at different groups. If you write a language for long-term maintainability and reliability, that language will probably not be appropriate for shell scripts.

    Many languages are testing beds for features or concepts. These are usually extremely flexible and fun and can be very quick to code in. Basic was one of these, as are Perl, Ruby, …

    Other languages are reduced to a bear minimum and rarely change–they focus on backwards compatibility and consistency. New features would be avoided and, when they are added, would be tested in-depth before being added to the standard (Yeah, they tend to be standards based more than the previous group). C, Java, Ada and C++ were designed to fit here. C# is possibly a crossover with more features being added than these others, but more stability than the previous group.

    Now, besides what drives language features, there is how the language is built. Lanuages are often initially written in another language, however not in the way you are assuming. Java is mostly written in Java now, but the JVM is probably mostly hand-coded assembly, however you can be SURE that C’s printf is nowhere to be found in Java.

    A compiled language generally consists of your program reduced to a certain set of codes (machine language or bytecode) and is then packaged with a set of routines (like System.out.println). However, println doesn’t just call C’s println, instead a library is created (written in some combination of Java, C, assembly) that knows how to do the output itself.

    In C the library would be generated the same way, a combination of C and assembly that generates the assembly code that can execute “printf”

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have one question with mixing C-string and fortran-string in one file. Supposed I
In Fortran, you can pass a function/subroutine A as an argument to another function/subroutine
In Fortran, a clear difference exists between function and subroutine: functions return one value,
With FORTRAN 77 is it possible to perform a swap on two arrays, in
I have a program written in Fortran 90/95; after invocation it always reads a
I have read through the Fortran 95 book by Metcalf, Reid and Cohen, and
i use ifort and gfortran to compile my Fortran program. However i also use
I'm having trouble trying to compile a simple fortran program which uses a module
Is there a test suite out there that checks whether a Fortran compiler fully
I have a C file generated with f2c (Fortran to C translator) that contains

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.