Home/ Questions/Q 8711223
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-13T04:49:17+00:00

Found this related post, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7139/should-a-first-release-be-an-0-1-version-or-1-0b , but it is not about Ruby Gems. I

  • 0

Found this related post, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7139/should-a-first-release-be-an-0-1-version-or-1-0b, but it is not about Ruby Gems. I am asking about the best and common practice for Ruby Gems.

I’ll start with 0.0.1, and probably get to 0.0.10 when it is fully tested and ready for use.

Does it make sense to leave the version at 0.x.x? Or does that mean that the gem is beta and not stable and not ready for use? Is it better to set the version to 1.0.0?

Hosting on RubyGems and GitHub.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Thanks to matt, the docs at semver.org say that yes, release software should be at least v1.0.

    • 0