Home/ Questions/Q 6756125
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-26T13:29:14+00:00

From my experience with Windows 7 (64-bit) and Java, a 32-bit JRE uses less

  • 0

From my experience with Windows 7 (64-bit) and Java, a 32-bit JRE uses less memory and runs significantly faster than a 64-bit JRE (provided you don’t need or benefit from having a lot of memory). I imagine the same thing is true for Mac OSX (and other platforms) as well.

I am currently running OSX Lion (v10.7), and I have installed the standard Java app. Under Java Preferences, I see “Java SE 6” from “Apple Inc.” for both CPU-types “32-bit” and “64-bit” version “1.6.0_26-b03-383”. I have changed the preferred order to put the 32-bit version on top of the 64-bit version, hoping that this would make the 32-bit version default.

But “java -version” still says:

java version "1.6.0_26"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03-383-11A511c)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.1-b02-383, mixed mode)

Is it possible to use the 32-bit version by default? And how?

Also, does anyone have experiences / comparative measurements regarding speed and memory efficiency between the 32/64-bit versions?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    I found out now, that the 32-bit JVM can be explicitly launched using the -d32 switch.

    On my machine, “java -version -d32” says:

    java version "1.6.0_26"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03-383-11A511c)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 20.1-b02-383, mixed mode)

    and although it doesn’t say so, it is a 32-bit JVM.

    • 0