Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4237846
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T02:49:38+00:00 2026-05-21T02:49:38+00:00

From my understanding at the Richfaces demo page and docs , I should be

  • 0

From my understanding at the Richfaces demo page and docs, I should be able to skin standard HTML elements.

This feature provides styling for standard HTML form elements in order to be highly compilant with RichFaces common look’n’feel.

I may be a little burnt out with RF today, but I don’t see how to get skinning on regular elements. For example if I wanted a hand made table to match the fancy Richfaces tables I would have thought something like this would work:

<table class="rich-table">
        <tr class="rich-tr">
        <a4j:repeat value="#{myBean.elements}" var="e">
            <th class="rich-th" >
                                   <h:outputText value="#{e.text}" />
                            </th>
                    </a4j:repeat>
            </tr>
    </table>

Other elements I’ve tried to skin haven’t been working either, so I feel I am going at this the wrong way. The ultimate goal is to have standard HTML elements blend in and still allow the skins to be swapped from say blueSky to emeraldGreen w/o changing specific elements.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T02:49:39+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 2:49 am

    Try this. Add this context parameter: org.richfaces.CONTROL_SKINNING to web.xml and set it to ‘enable’. I’m not 100% sure it will skin a table tag. If not, you can use #{richSkin.any_param_name} to skin the table manually.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

From my understanding of the docs this general approach should work: begin try1 rescue
From my understanding, this code: Microsoft.VisualBasic.StrDup(3, 123) should return 123123123 . Instead it returns
My understanding from reading the docs runs something like this: client is a subclass
From my understanding the view is the html/javascript/page layout, the controller filters and routes
From my understanding of the manual for DECIMAL in the mysql docs, it states
MariaDB 5.3 introduced dynamic columns. From my understanding the next version of mysql should
From Microsoft's page Understanding ASP.NET View State : in the instantiation stage of the
From my understanding, an absolutely positioned element should be wherever it should be as
From my understanding, the function super should allow a Class that is nested within
From my understanding the following should properly throw a custom error from a WCF

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.