Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 768127
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T18:07:57+00:00 2026-05-14T18:07:57+00:00

from my understanding, require pastes code into the calling php file. what if you

  • 0

from my understanding, require pastes code into the calling php file.

what if you were requiring from inside a method…it would paste the entire code/class inside the method, blocking the next statement in the method.

eg.

  function test() {

    require 'pathtosomeclasscode';
    somestatement; // any code after the require is blocked.

 }

how do i get around this, to be able to require code where-ever, without it being pasted in that exact spot?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T18:07:57+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:07 pm

    Somewhat surprisingly, this appears to work just fine. The included code will execute inside the scope of Baz::bork() — but the the code simply defines a class, and classes are global. So you end up with a defined class.

    File: Foo.php:

    <?PHP
    class Foo{
          function bar(){
                   echo "Hello from Foo::bar()!\n";
          }
    }
    

    File: Baz.php:

    <?PHP
    class Baz{
    
          function bork(){
                   require_once "Foo.php";
                   $f = new Foo();
               $f->bar();
          }
    }
    
    echo "testing internal definition:\n";
    $b = new Baz();
    $b->bork();
    
    echo "\ntesting in global scope:\n";
    
    $f = new Foo();
    $f->bar();
    echo "\nall done\n";
    

    Output:

    $ php Baz.php
    testing internal definition:
    Hello from Foo::bar()!
    
    testing in global scope:
    Hello from Foo::bar()!
    
    all done
    

    Now, I can’t think of many places where you’d want to do things this way. People typically require_once() any possible dependencies at the top of their class file, outside of the class definition.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 415k
  • Answers 415k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes, Castle.ActiveRecord.Linq is production ready. It's included in the latest… May 15, 2026 at 8:53 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer So after a whole lot of experimenting I managed to… May 15, 2026 at 8:53 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer When setting a binding on a Setter you don't need… May 15, 2026 at 8:53 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.