Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6834523
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T23:07:19+00:00 2026-05-26T23:07:19+00:00

From my understanding, the virtual keyword allows you to use the base class’ method,

  • 0

From my understanding, the virtual keyword allows you to use the base class’ method, and override allows you to override it in a class that inherits from the base class. My confusion is that I just tested not using the virtual keyword in the base class’ method definition and not including that method in the derived class, and I was still able to call the base class’ method (it showed up in intellisense and ran). Also, I know that if i wanted a new method definition for that same method for my derived class that I could use the new keyword..

I am probably missing a key point but this is the way I understand it which is why I am confused as to the purpose of virtual and override

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T23:07:19+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:07 pm

    My confusion is that I just tested not using the virtual keyword in
    the base class’ method definition and not including that method in the
    derived class, and I was still able to call the base class’ method (it
    showed up in intellisense and ran).

    This is expected behaviour.

    Virtual allows you to override a method which is defined in the base class, in other words extend the implementation of the method in the derived class.

    Differences between the new keyword and the override one can be found on MSDN here.

    It is access modifiers (private, public, protected) that affects if you are able to call the base class method in the derived class or not.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

From my understanding, Lua is an embeddable scripting language that can execute methods on
My understanding of Hibernate is that as objects are loaded from the DB they
My understanding is that it's advised testers are separate from developers, i.e you obviously
Are there any understanding / maintainability issues that result from code like inVar1 ==
It is my understanding that although Mercurial has support from branches, the community generally
I'm having trouble understanding what the purpose of the virtual keyword in C++. I
The pure virtual destructor in base class should have a definition. Otherwise compiler will
Is my understanding correct, that the following class and table design is not possible
I believe, a derived class can override only those functions which it inherited from
I have the following class hierarchy in C++: class Base { virtual void apply()

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.