Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 242807
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T20:52:07+00:00 2026-05-11T20:52:07+00:00

From what I understand, OOP is the most commonly used paradigm for large scale

  • 0

From what I understand, OOP is the most commonly used paradigm for large scale projects. I also know that some smaller subsets of big systems use other paradigms (e.g. SQL, which is declarative), and I also realize that at lower levels of computing OOP isn’t really feasible. But it seems to me that usually the pieces of higher level solutions are almost always put together in a OOP fashion.

Are there any scenarios where a truly non-OOP paradigm is actually a better choice for a largescale solution? Or is that unheard of these days?

I’ve wondered this ever since I’ve started studying CS; it’s easy to get the feeling that OOP is some nirvana of programming that will never be surpassed.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T20:52:07+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 8:52 pm

    In my opinion, the reason OOP is used so widely isn’t so much that it’s the right tool for the job. I think it’s more that a solution can be described to the customer in a way that they understand.

    A CAR is a VEHICLE that has an ENGINE. That’s programming and real world all in one!

    It’s hard to comprehend anything that can fit the programming and real world quite so elegantly.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

As you can understand from title, i modified Settings.cs file.Added some properties, some code
I found that Maven implies specific directory layout. But I don't understand from here:
I've been tinkering with some code in a effort to understand OOP using c.
From the design of Scala's collections I understand that something like: scala> BitSet(1,2,3) map
I have read several papers on CoffeeScript OOP. From them, do I understand correctly
As far as I understand from the documentation the QUdpSocket are async but, still,
From what I understand IMAP requires a connection per each user. I'm writing an
From what I understand using $this->db->insert() escapes the values: http://codeigniter.com/user_guide/database/active_record.html#insert Note: All values are
From what I understand, when a socket buffer (skb) is allocated by the kernel
From what I understand there is no way of type-checking the messages send in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.