Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6632017
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T22:37:38+00:00 2026-05-25T22:37:38+00:00

From what i undertand it is impossible to completely prevent a transaction from deadlocking.

  • 0

From what i undertand it is impossible to completely prevent a transaction from deadlocking.

I would like to have transaction that neverfail from the perpective of application code.
So i have seen this pattern in use for Microsoft SQL and I wonder if this is a good idea?


    DECLARE @retry  tinyint
    SET @retry  = 5
    WHILE @retry >0
    BEGIN
      BEGIN TRANSACTION
      BEGIN TRY
        // do transaction her
        COMMIT
        BREAK
      END TRY
      BEGIN CATCH
        ROLLBACK

        if (ERROR_NUMBER() = 1205 OR ERROR_NUMBER() = 1222)
        BEGIN
          SET @retry = @retry - 1
          IF @retry = 0
             RAISEERROR('Could not complete transaction',16,1);
          WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:00.05' -- Wait for 50 ms
          CONTINUE
        END
        ELSE
        BEGIN
          RAISEERROR('Non-deadlock condition encountered',16,1);
          BREAK;
        END
      END CATCH;
    END
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T22:37:39+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 10:37 pm

    Retry logic for recoverable errors should be in the client code.

    For deadlocks, MSDN states to do it there

    If you retry in SQL, then you may hit CommandTimeout eventually.

    There are other errors too so you can write a generic handler

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like only to start some applications dynamically with the package name from
Assume that we have a network deployed desktop application written in .NET. We don't
I have a bit old project that I would call legacy. Some characteristics of
I am using DBus in a project. I understand from DBus specification that for
From what I understand, in TDD you have to write a failing test first,
From what I understand of REST principles, URLs should represent a single resource, like
With iPhone, creating your own AppFramework is made impossible by the fact that Apple
Introduction I am aware that "user-defined conversions to or from a base class are
I'm toying with an application that is, roughly speaking, a sort of modeler application
It seems that it is impossible to pass a variable to a Model's Constructor

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.