Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 934243
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T20:58:01+00:00 2026-05-15T20:58:01+00:00

func(a(), b.c) When executing the line above in the pdb debugger, using step will

  • 0
func(a(), b.c)

When executing the line above in the pdb debugger, using step will actually step into a, and then into the getter for b.c if its atypical (such as being a property), before actually stepping into func.

Generally I find myself using step followed by r to return from the frames I’m not interested in, and often inexplicably pass over and miss the opportunity to step directly into func.

How do I step directly into func, or what sequence of debugger commands will guarantee that I end up in func rather than passing over it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T20:58:02+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 8:58 pm

    tb func (“temporary break at func”) followed by c (“continue”) should work.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 502k
  • Answers 502k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This: SELECT c.title, c.id, c.date, c.author, u.username, ( SELECT MAX(reply_date)… May 16, 2026 at 2:33 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer -lGLU should fix the first error and for the second… May 16, 2026 at 2:33 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Why not let a library validate it for you? You… May 16, 2026 at 2:33 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

When executing do-file: func[file][ if error? error: try [ if (find [%.r %.cgi] (suffix?
I am adding range of integers (101,105) using Func<> delegate.I suppose to get 101,102,..105
OK, I admit it this code will just look weird to you, and that's
I need to call a static function from an object using the Singleton design,
I need a method that takes an Action (or a Func), but the Action
I have expression Expression<Func<Car, Driver, bool>> CanBeDrivenBy = (car, driver) => car.Category == 'B'
I want to write a test case which will test a list of functions.
I have a Func defined as follows: Func<Foo, bool> IsSuperhero = x => x.WearsUnderpantsOutsideTrousers;
I am working with System.Func but have reached a stumbling block with it. System.Func<TReturn>
Isn't a pointer just a reference when you don't de-reference it? #include stdafx.h #define

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.