Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7803673
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T01:39:39+00:00 2026-06-02T01:39:39+00:00

Function argument names in declarations (that most likely reside in the header file) are

  • 0

Function argument names in declarations (that most likely reside in the header file) are seemingly completely ignored by the compiler. What are the reasons for allowing the following to compile using either declaration version 1 or 2?


implementation

void A::doStuff(int numElements, float* data)
{
    //stuff
}

declaration – Version 1

class A
{
public:
    void doStuff(int numElements, float* data);
}

declaration – Version 2

class A
{
public:
    void doStuff(int, float*);
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T01:39:40+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 1:39 am

    The compiler only needs to know what kind of arguments the method requires. It’s unimportant for the compiler how you call them.

    The compiler needs to know the argument types for several reasons:

    • Decide which method to use if there are several methods with the same method name
    • Decide whether the input parameters are valid
    • Decide whether the parameters need to be casted
    • Decide how to generate the CODE to call the method and handle the response

    However, I suggest to use the first header version. It helps other developers (and yourself) to use the functions and know what parameters have which meaning.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am trying to write a JavaScript function that will return its first argument(function)
What is convention for local vars that has same meaning as function argument? If
I'd like to create a function My`Print[args__] that prints the names of the symbols
Does the C standard support something similar to __func__ for the function arguments' names?
Can I use type as a name for a python function argument? def fun(name,
Is there a logical way to strip out function names and their arguments using
Can function argument have hint in cfscript (CF9)? CFML style: <cffunction name=myFunc output=false returntype=void>
As a function argument I get a vector<double>& vec (an output vector, hence non-const)
What does the last function argument mean in C language? Please, point to documentation
A C++11 template function which takes a function object argument, such as: template <typename

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.