Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8238733
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T19:54:49+00:00 2026-06-07T19:54:49+00:00

(function( $ ){ MY_SINGLETON_OBJ = MY_SINGLETON_OBJ || (function () { // initialize the singleton

  • 0
(function( $ ){  
    MY_SINGLETON_OBJ = MY_SINGLETON_OBJ || (function () { // initialize the singleton using an immediate anonymous function which returns an object
        // init here (only happens once even if this plugin is included multiple times)
        console.log("Initialized");
        return {
            version: "0.1"
            // return values that are to be accessible from the singleton
        };
    })();
    $.fn.MyJqueryObjectMethod = function (a, b, c) {
        // perform tasks
        return this; // maintain chainability
    };
})(jQuery);

The singleton is polluting the global namespace. Is there a better way to define it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T19:54:51+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 7:54 pm

    That looks to me like it would work, though I think you should at least declare your singleton globally rather than use an implicit definition.

    You don’t have to be that tricky. You can just as easily do this which I think it a bit more readable and obvious:

    // explicit global definition
    var MY_SINGLETON_OBJ;
    
    (function( $ ){  
        if (!MY_SINGLETON_OBJ) {
            // initalize the singleton here
            MY_SINGLETON_OBJ = {};
            MY_SINGLETON_OBJ.prop1 = 1;
        }
        $.fn.MyJqueryObjectMethod = function (a, b, c) {
            // perform tasks
            return this; // maintain chainability
        };
    })(jQuery);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to call a static function from an object using the Singleton design,
I want to create a singleton object in Ext JS 4. Here is my
my function: struct hostent * gethost(char * hostname){ if(/*some condition under which I want
class SingleTon { private static $instance; private function __construct() { } public function getInstance()
I wrote a singleton called SomeValues where I initialize a foo NSMutableArray. I then
I have a Singleton class which is highly dependent on the XML file it
I have a singleton here that I am trying to use the same instance
All the singleton patterns I have seen use a reference to the object to
I built some the following i18n function which is called several times when rendering
I'm looking for a way to monitor/observe a singleton class I'm using to pass

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.