Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1033333
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T14:12:59+00:00 2026-05-16T14:12:59+00:00

gcc 4.4.4 c89 However, I am having a problem trying to display all the

  • 0

gcc 4.4.4 c89

However, I am having a problem trying to display all the animals.

I have the following code.

I am trying display all the animals in the array. So I have 3 array of pointers to char*. Then an array of pointers to these data sets.

I have tried to control the inner loop for checking for a -1 and a NULL for the outer.

void initialize_char_array()
{
    char *data_set1[] = {"dog", "cat", "bee", NULL};
    char *data_set2[] = {"rabbit", "ant", "snake", "rat", NULL};
    char *data_set3[] = {"cow", "lizard", "beaver", "bat", "hedgehog", NULL};

    char *ptr_char[] = {*data_set1, *data_set2, *data_set3, NULL};

    display_char_array(ptr_char);
}

void display_char_array(char **ptr_char)
{
    size_t inner = 0, outer = 0;

    for(outer = 0; ptr_char[outer] != NULL; outer++) {
        for(inner = 0; *ptr_char[inner] != -1; inner++) {
            printf("data [ %s ]\n", ptr_char[outer][inner]);
        }
    }
}

Many thanks for any suggestions,

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T14:12:59+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:12 pm

    *data_set1 is the same as data_set1[0].
    Here’s a fixed version of what you trying to do. IMHO it’s matter of taste which are you using:
    index-variable or pointer-iterators in the loop, apparently compiler will generate the very same machine code.

    // type of ptr_char changed
    void display_char_array(char **ptr_char[])
    {
        size_t inner = 0, outer = 0;
    
        for(outer = 0; ptr_char[outer] != NULL; outer++) {
            // check for NULL in inner loop!
            for(inner = 0; ptr_char[outer][inner] != NULL; inner++) {
                printf("data [ %s ]\n", ptr_char[outer][inner]);
            }
        }
    }
    void initialize_char_array()
    {
        char *data_set1[] = {"dog", "cat", "bee", NULL};
        char *data_set2[] = {"rabbit", "ant", "snake", "rat", NULL};
        char *data_set3[] = {"cow", "lizard", "beaver", "bat", "hedgehog", NULL};
    
        // fixed
        char **ptr_char[] = {data_set1, data_set2, data_set3, NULL};
    
        display_char_array(ptr_char);
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

gcc 4.4.2 c89 I have the following code. #if defined ( __linux__ ) log_msg(stderr,
gcc 4.4.3 c89 I have the following source file. However, I get a stack
gcc 4.4.2 c89 I was just working on some pointers. However, with the program
gcc 4.4.2 c89 I re-engineering some code in c89. However, I am totally confused
gcc 4.4.4 c89 I am using the code below. However, I keep getting the
gcc 4.4.4 c89 I understand pointers ok. However, I am stepping up to pointer
gcc 4.4.4 c89 I have the following function but I cannot free the memory.
gcc 4.4.3 c89 I am trying to display the address. Basically, I just want
gcc c89 I am getting a stack dump on this line: strcpy(comp->persons->name, Joe); However,
gcc 4.4.2 c89 I have these defines in our API header file. /* Reason

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.