Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7690063
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T20:18:41+00:00 2026-05-31T20:18:41+00:00

gcc c89 I am just looking to link against the below shared library. I

  • 0

gcc c89

I am just looking to link against the below shared library.

I am wondering why the programmer has created so many soft-links. The programmer has left the company and I am just wondering what is the purpose.

lrwxrwxrwx. 1       24 Jan 11 11:23 libsofia-sip-ua.so -> libsofia-sip-ua.so.0.6.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1       24 Jan 11 11:23 libsofia-sip-ua.so.0 -> libsofia-sip-ua.so.0.6.0
-rwxrwxr-x. 1  4728304 Jan 11 11:19 libsofia-sip-ua.so.0.6.0

For what I can understand if the library was to get updated to a newer version you could just soft-link it with the updated version.

But why create libsofia-sip.so.0?

Many thanks for any suggestions,

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T20:18:42+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 8:18 pm

    The filename ending in .so is the one used by the linker (not dynamic linker) when you use the -l option to specify a library you want to search/link. The linker is unaware of other suffixes and won’t find them. When the linker opens this file, it finds a different name in the DT_SONAME field of the library’s header, usually the name with a single-number suffix. This is the name it will store in the DT_NEEDED field of the new program’s dynamic linking header.

    The filename ending in .so.N (e.g. N=0 in your case) is the one corresponding to the DT_SONAME in the library file, and it represents a series of library versions which all have a compatible ABI.

    The filename ending in .so.N.X.Y is the actual file for the currently installed library version. It’s possible for more than one of these to exist, and normally the other symlinks will be setup to point to the most recent version. But old versions are not automatically overwritten this way, so you could manually load an old one with LD_PRELOAD or replace the symlinks if there’s a reason you need to downgrade.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

gcc 4.6.2 c89 I am just wondering if this is a good way to
gcc (GCC) 4.6.3 c89 Hello, I am just wondering if this is the best
gcc 4.4.4 C89 I am just wondering what most C programmers do when they
gcc 4.4.4 c89 I am just wondering is it worth passing a const into
gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3) 4.6.1 c89 Just wondering is there a better way to do
gcc 4.4.4 c89 I am just wondering is there any standard that should be
gcc 4.6.2 c89 I am just wondering what could cause more memory issues. For
Using gcc 4.4.3 c89: I am just working on the following code below: I
gcc 4.4.3 c89 I am just getting started with log4c. However, there is very
gcc (GCC) 4.6.3 c89 apache runtime portable libraries Hello, Just a simple question I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.