Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3453970
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T09:26:14+00:00 2026-05-18T09:26:14+00:00

(gdb) s Things:action (this=0x7fffffffdce0, packet=0x62c980) at file:41 41 if( thing->work(data) ) { (gdb) s

  • 0
(gdb) s
Things:action (this=0x7fffffffdce0, packet=0x62c980) at file:41
41              if( thing->work(data) ) {
(gdb) s
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000000004040e1 in Things:action (this=0x7fffffffdce0, packet=0x62c980) at file:41
41              if( thing->work(data) ) {

In a backtrace, call to work(data) is a last one; and the segmentation happened (as it seems) before the GDB-managed process entered work(data). In a list, there is no declaration of work(data), so guessing that more code was executed, than is shown by backtrace and latest step.

  1. Can that segfault come from the bad pointer being passed as a function argument in a bad manner (without “extern C”, or some other preparations)? (assuming no function code was executed)
  2. How to get a detailed trace to determine, was any work() code executed after entering the function, or the error happened right at the moment, when process tried to enter the function, thereby passing it’s arguments to libc?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T09:26:14+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:26 am

    As I said in the comment : I believe that the execution never reached work(data) because the this pointer is invalid (0x7fffffffdce0 looks like garbage). The SIGSEGV is on this->.

    Has the object been destroyed / deleted at some point, and have you kept a reference or pointer to it ?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am debugging with GDB a crunching number C++ program. It takes 10 minutes
I have an ANSI C program comprising two files. The first file contains the
Everytime I attach to a process using gdb, it will stop the target program,
I've been looking into this problem for hours and tried all sorts of things,
Here is a program I made this program has segmentation fault I checked it
Here is a program I made this program has segmentation fault I checked it
I am using eclipse cdt to develop a c++ program. One thing that drives
My gdb is GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-1.162.el4rh) and I can't debug templates.
And why does gdb seem to hit it?
When using gdb and Vim, often I want to stop on a particular line.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.