Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6009205
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T01:56:14+00:00 2026-05-23T01:56:14+00:00

General Overview: The function below spits out a random ID. I’m using this to

  • 0

General Overview:

The function below spits out a random ID. I’m using this to provide a confirmation alias to identify a record. However, I’ve had to check for collision(however unlikely), because we are only using a five digit length. With the allowed characters listed below, it comes out to about 33 million plus combinations. Eventually we will get to five million or so records so collision becomes an issue.

The Problem:

Checking for dupe aliases is inefficient and resource heavy. Five million records is a lot to search through. Especially when this search is being conducted concurrently by different users.

My Question:

Is there a way to ‘auto increment’ the combinations allowed by this function? Meaning I only have to search for the last record’s alias and move on to the next combination?

Acknowledged Limitations:

I realize the code would be vastly different than the function below. I also realize that mysql has an auto increment feature for numerical IDs, but the project is requiring a five digit alias with the allowed characters of ‘23456789ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZ’. My hands are tied on that issue.

My Current Function:

 public function random_id_gen($length)
 {
     $characters = '23456789ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZ';
     $max = strlen($characters) - 1;
     $string = '';

     for ($i = 0; $i < $length; $i++) {
         $string .= $characters[mt_rand(0, $max)];
     }

     return $string;
 }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T01:56:15+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 1:56 am

    Why not just create a unique index on the alias column?

    CREATE UNIQUE INDEX uniq_alias ON MyTable(alias);
    

    at which point you can try your insert/update and if it returns an error, generate a new alias and try again.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a very general open question What is the best way to provide
This is a general programming question (it doesn't have a specific purpose/application yet). If
The youtube embed code's general structure is like this: <iframe width=560 height=349 src=http://www.youtube.com/embed/MiYND_zvIc0 frameborder=0
This is an example of my general problem: I have different implementations of ITextSearcher
This is not a theoretical or general question about when to use pass by
I know that the general consensus is to use one or the other, but
I have very little experience with MySQL/SQL in general - total n00b really! I
We have a legacy database with some (older) columns using SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS and more recent
I am attempting to fire up ISQL 4.10DC1 on MS-DOS 6.22, but cant seem

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.