Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3280804
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T19:44:44+00:00 2026-05-17T19:44:44+00:00

Given a decimal x, I want to test if x is within 10^-12 of

  • 0

Given a decimal x, I want to test if x is within 10^-12 of a rational number with denominator 9999 or less. Obviously I could do it by looking at x, 2x, 3x, and so on, and seeing if any of these is sufficiently close to an integer. But is there a more efficient algorithm?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T19:44:44+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 7:44 pm

    There is an algorithm called the continued fraction algorithm that will give you “best” rational approximations in a certain defined sense. You can stop when your denominator exceeds 9999 and then go back to the previous convergent and compare to see if it is close enough. Of course if the decimal is a small enough rational number the algorithm will terminate early.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

given a number and n, I want to format it in the following way:
Let's say I have a long decimal-place number and I want to use that
Given the following line: [aaaa bbbb cccc dddd] [decimal](18, 0) NULL, How would you
Given the following list: [ ('A', '', Decimal('4.0000000000'), 1330, datetime.datetime(2012, 6, 8, 0, 0)),
Given a certain date, I want to set the value of a cell with
I want to create a program for generating the series for the given base-n.
The problem is to derive a formula for determining number of digits a given
Possible Duplicate: Default Number of Decimal Places to Output in PHP basically a bit
Given: table 'thing': age --- 3.4 3.4 10.1 40 45 49 I want to
I want to assign the decimal variable "trans" to the double variable "this.Opacity". decimal

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.