Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3351866
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T01:57:37+00:00 2026-05-18T01:57:37+00:00

Given a function/type declaration like this: function Person(name, … other args …){ this.name …

  • 0

Given a function/type declaration like this:

function Person(name, ... other args ...){
    this.name
    ... other init code ...
}

I would like to be able to call the Person constructor with an array of arguments to be applied to it. I could do:

Person.apply(this, args)

Except that this doesn’t instantiate a person, it merely calls it as a function. Is there any way you call it in this way but in the “new” context, i.e behaving like:

new Person(...)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T01:57:38+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 1:57 am

    Correct answer has emerged on the other thread: How can I construct an object using an array of values for parameters, rather than listing them out, in JavaScript?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In Haskell function type ( -> ) is given, it's not an algebraic data
My friend is trying to create a utility function that is given some Type
Given this function: > function Get-ArrayOfArrays() { (1,2),(3,4) | % { $_ } }
Given a function, I'd like to know whether it's a developer-defined function or a
Given this: data Foo = Bar { name :: String } | Baz {
I would like function accept a class that has inherited SQLAlchemy's declarative_base, and it
Given a list, I'd like to divide it into clusters using a boundary function.
Here I have written my name in main argument declaration but still this program
I define a custom PowerShell type with New-Object. I would like a parameter to
Given: typedef type-declaration synonym; I can see how: typedef long unsigned int size_t; declares

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.