Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 172103
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T13:06:22+00:00 2026-05-11T13:06:22+00:00

Given a graph of n nodes that are all interconnected on a coordinate plane,

  • 0

Given a graph of n nodes that are all interconnected on a coordinate plane, what’s the best way to find a subtree of minimal distance that contains m nodes?

The only solution I’ve found to this problem is to generate all combinations of the nodes to connect and attempt to connect these nodes via either Kruskal’s or Prim’s algorithm while disregarding the rest, then compare all trees created and find the smallest one, but this isn’t exactly efficient when it comes to larger trees.

Is there a faster, more efficient algorithm/method?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T13:06:23+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:06 pm

    You are asking about the K-minimum spanning tree (k-MST) problem, which is known to be NP-complete. So you’re not going to do much better than your current algorithm.

    However, in the comments, you say that your graph is generated from a coordinate plane, so I can only assume that you have some geometric information about the nodes in the graph. The WWW compendium entry mentions that you can use a polynomial-time approximation scheme for Euclidean k-MST. This paper describes one:

    Arora, Sanjeev. (1996), Polynomial time approximation scheme for Euclidean TSP and other geometric problems, In Proceedings of the 37th Ann. IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 2-11.

    They mention k-MST directly in there, so I think you could try that algorithm if you really want more speed.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given a directed graph, the goal is to combine the node with the nodes
We are given an undirected graph G = (V, E) and two vertices s,
Given a basic grid (like a piece of graph paper), where each cell has
Given a Python object of any kind, is there an easy way to get
I am given a problem where I have been given N nodes in a
I have some simple code that represents a graph using a square boolean matrix
I have an n-partite (undirected) graph, given as an adjacency matrix, for instance this
I'm looking for any tools that can give you code churn metrics (graphs and
Given a specific DateTime value, how do I display relative time, like: 2 hours
Given a select with multiple option's in jQuery. $select = $(<select></select>); $select.append(<option>Jason</option>) //Key =

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.