Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 74975
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T20:26:35+00:00 2026-05-10T20:26:35+00:00

Given a list of sets: S_1 : [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ] S_2

  • 0

Given a list of sets:

  • S_1 : [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ]
  • S_2 : [ 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]
  • S_3 : [ 8, 9, 10, 11 ]
  • S_4 : [ 1, 8, 12, 13 ]
  • S_5 : [ 6, 7, 14, 15, 16, 17 ]

What the most efficient way to merge all sets that share at least 2 elements? I suppose this is similar to a connected components problem. So the result would be:

  • [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 15, 16, 17] (S_1 UNION S_2 UNION S_5)
  • [ 8, 9, 10, 11 ]
  • [ 1, 8, 12, 13 ] (S_4 shares 1 with S_1, and 8 with S_3, but not merged because they only share one element in each)

The naive implementation is O(N^2), where N is the number of sets, which is unworkable for us. This would need to be efficient for millions of sets.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T20:26:35+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 8:26 pm
    Let there be a list of many Sets named (S)  Perform a pass through all elements of S, to determine the range (LOW .. HIGH).  Create an array of pointer to Set, of dimensions (LOW, HIGH), named (M).  do     Init all elements of M to NULL.         Iterate though S, processing them one Set at a time, named (Si).          Permutate all ordered pairs in Si. (P1, P2) where P1 <= P2.         For each pair examine M(P1, P2)             if M(P1, P2) is NULL                 Continue with the next pair.             otherwise                 Merge Si, into the Set pointed to by, M(P1, P2).                 Remove Si from S, as it has been merged.                 Move on to processing Set S(i + 1)          If Si was not merged,              Permutate again through Si             For each pair, make M(P1, P2) point to Si.  while At least one set was merged during the pass. 

    My head is saying this is about Order (2N ln N). Take that with a grain of salt.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 282k
  • Answers 282k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If I understand the question correctly, you could do a… May 13, 2026 at 3:58 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Here are a couple of great tutorials... Scott Guthrie Joe… May 13, 2026 at 3:58 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer List<T> is a class with a type parameter. This is… May 13, 2026 at 3:58 pm

Related Questions

Here's the jist of the problem: Given a list of sets, such as: [
Here's the brief problem: Input: a list of strings, each containing numbers ( 3.4
I'm using nested sets (aka modified preorder tree traversal) to store a list of
I'm looking for a way to generate combinations of objects ordered by a single

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.