Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1015499
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T10:24:35+00:00 2026-05-16T10:24:35+00:00

Given a set of two or more logical conditions, is it possible to algorithmically

  • 0

Given a set of two or more logical conditions, is it possible to algorithmically determine that exactly ONE of them will evaluate to TRUE? For example:

# this should pass, since for every X, only one condition is taken
cond 1: (X >= 1.0) 
cond 2: (X < 1.0)

# this should fail
cond 1: (X < 1.0)
cond 2: (X > 2.0)

# this should also fail, since X=1.0 would meet both conditions
cond 1: (X < 2.0)
cond 2: (X > 0.0)

# there may be more than one variable involved
cond 1: (X >= 1.0 && Y >= 0)
cond 2: (X < 1.0 && Y <= -1)

These conditions are generated from a domain specific language and used to determine the next execution path. i.e. users compose a condition for each option when the execution tree splits into multiple paths, and the condition that evaluates to true determines the path that is to be taken. For the simulation to be valid these should be only one possible path that can be taken for any given values.

At present, I evaluate these conditions at runtime and throw a tantrum if more than one (or none) of them are True.

I would like to be able to check errorneous conditions during the parse stage (domain language to compilable source code). Is it possible? How would one go about validating the conditions?

update

With regards to what can be included in the conditions, the scope is rather wide in practice. All these are possible conditions:

  • X >= Y && Y < Z
  • X.within_radius(0.4)
  • X IN some_array
  • X * Y < Z

final update

It does seem like a solution that covers all possible conditions is not possible (or at least, given my limited knowledge, not possible within the time allocated for the problem). Will revisit this some day, but for now accepting answer that brought me forward the furthest.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T10:24:36+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 10:24 am

    EDIT: I’ll restate because it seems like the other answers are assuming a bunch of things which have since been confirmed:

    If you can state your conditions (and the constraint that only one is true) in terms of Presburger arithmetic, then you can write a decision procedure to verify that property statically. This seems perfectly achievable from the examples above.

    The “blunt instrument” approach is to basically interface with something like an automatic theorem prover or an SMT solver (where you would basically be trying to prove the negation of the statement “there exists some value x that satisfies constraint1 XOR constraint2”). I’ve programmatically interfaced with CVC3 before, and found it pretty good to work with, but my understand is that it has been surpassed by other SMT solvers.

    Anything else you do to solve this problem is probably going to end up approximating some implementation of the kinds of tools I’ve suggested, I think. Depending on exactly how your constraints are specified, you might be able to get away with implementing some kind of decision procedure for something like Presburger arithmetic.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

It appears that NHibernate cannot automap more than one IList of a given type
Given two sets a = [5,3,4,1,2,6,7] b = [1,2,4,9] c = set(a) - set(b)
I can see that Collections.unmodifiableSet returns an unmodifiable view of the given set but
This is one of the solution of getting true or false from given set
Given a set of questions that have linked survey and category id: > db.questions.find().toArray();
I am thinking of giving one or more set of introductory lectures to introduce
I have two tables Activity and Action. One or more actions can be performed
I will phrase the problem in the precise form that I want below: Given
I'm trying to get two (or more) Django applications set up at subdirectories under
Given that I have two lists that each contain a separate subset of a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.