Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6615919
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T20:31:15+00:00 2026-05-25T20:31:15+00:00

Given a situation like this: using (var foo = CreateFoo()) { if (foo !=

  • 0

Given a situation like this:

using (var foo = CreateFoo()) {
    if (foo != null) {
        // do stuff
    }
}

I would like to avoid the nested if. Sadly, the obvious solution is not possible because break does not work with using:

using (var foo = CreateFoo()) {
    if (foo == null) {
        break;
    }
    // do stuff
}

Is there a pattern to still avoid the additional indentation caused by the if != null?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T20:31:16+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 8:31 pm

    If you have sufficient control over the class returned from CreateFoo() you could just implement a Null Object and return this instead of the actual NULL value

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given an absolute or relative path (in a Unix-like system), I would like to
I'm using reflection to iterate over all the members of a given type. This
Given a situation in Django 1.0 where you have extra data on a Many-to-Many
Given a situation where you have 2 projects that in total will provide enough
Given the following situation (UML below), If Y has the method: public void PrintWs();
I am in a situation where I am given a comma-separated VarChar as input
I've got the following situation: <h2>This text is <span>pretty awesome</span></h2> I'm trying to give
Given a specific DateTime value, how do I display relative time, like: 2 hours
I have a table storing millions of rows. It looks something like this: Table_Docs
The situation is this: We have several (19) sites that are currently configured to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.