Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8880101
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T20:06:03+00:00 2026-06-14T20:06:03+00:00

Given an array of any type (integers in this case) and a Map that

  • 0

Given an array of any type (integers in this case) and a Map that tells what indexes are supposed to be swapped in an array. I am attempting to make a clean swap, but running into issues with the way I am using memcpy.

Here is what I have so far:

Goal: given a data array of [1,3,-1,2] and a mapping of [[0,3],[3,2],[2,1],[1,0]], a clean permutation would be [3,-1,2,1].

My current implementation : 0 3 -1 2… I think I have an off-by-one error somewhere.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <math.h>
#define MAP_SIZE 4

typedef struct MapEntry {
    int indexFrom;
    int indexTo;
} MapEntry;

typedef MapEntry * Map;

int permute(void *data, int nblobs, int szblob, const Map map);

void build_map(Map);
void build_data(int *);
int is_map_valid(Map);
void print_map(Map);
int is_valid(Map);

int map_comparator(const void * a, const void * b);

int main(int argc, char const *argv[])
{
    int nblobs, * data, i;
    size_t szblob;
    Map map = (Map)malloc(sizeof(Map));
    data = (int *) malloc(sizeof(int) * 4);

    build_map(map);

    data[0] = 1;
    data[1] = 3;
    data[2] = -1;
    data[3] = 2;

    nblobs = 4;
    szblob = sizeof(int);

    if (!permute(data, nblobs, szblob, map)) {
        printf("Invalid Map\n");
        return 0;
    }

    i = 0;
    for (i = 0; i < szblob; ++i) {
        printf("%d ", data[i]);
    }

    return 0;
}

void print_map(Map map){
    int i;
    for (i = 0; i < MAP_SIZE; ++i) {
        printf("[%d - %d]\n", map[i].indexFrom, map[i].indexTo);
    }
}

int map_comparator(const void *a, const void *b)
{
    const MapEntry *s1 = a;
    const MapEntry *s2 = b;
    if (s2->indexFrom != s1->indexFrom) {
        return s1->indexFrom - s2->indexFrom;
    } else {
        return s1->indexTo - s2->indexTo;
    }
}

int is_map_valid(Map map) {
    int i,j;
    for (i = 1; i < MAP_SIZE; ++i){
        j = i - 1;
        if (map[j].indexFrom == map[i].indexFrom)
            return 0;
        if (map[j].indexTo == map[i].indexTo)
            return 0;
    }
    return 1;
}

int is_valid(Map map) {
    qsort(map, MAP_SIZE, sizeof(MapEntry), map_comparator);
    if (!is_map_valid(map)) return 0;
    return 1;
}


int permute(void *data, int nblobs, int szblob, const Map map){
    int i, tmpFrom, tmpTo;
    void * a = (void *)malloc(szblob);
    char *p = data;

    /* check if map has duplicate keys */
    /* sort the list, then check whether or not the map is valid */
    if (!is_valid(map)) return 0;
    /* where issues occur */

    for (i = 0; i < nblobs; ++i){

        tmpFrom = map[i].indexFrom;

        tmpTo = map[i].indexTo;

        memcpy(a, &p[tmpFrom*szblob], szblob);

        memcpy(&p[tmpFrom*szblob], &p[tmpTo*szblob], szblob);

        memcpy(&p[tmpTo*szblob], a, szblob);

    }

    return 1;

}
/* build mapping */
void build_map(Map map){
    map[0].indexFrom = 0;
    map[0].indexTo = 3;
    map[1].indexFrom = 3;
    map[1].indexTo = 2;
    map[2].indexFrom = 2;
    map[2].indexTo = 1;
    map[3].indexFrom = 1;
    map[3].indexTo = 0;

}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T20:06:04+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 8:06 pm

    You are a victim of the non-standard GCC extension that is enabled by default and allows pointer arithmetics on pointers to void and pointers to function by treating the size of a void or of a function as 1. This extension can be disabled by specifying a C standard as, say, C99, using -std option — for example, -std=c99 (see gcc manual page for details). Alternatively, you may ask gcc to issue a warning for such cases by specifying -Wpointer-arith option.

    Back to the problem, consider what happens when you write &data[tmpFrom]. An address pointed by data is taken, then tmpFrom bytes are added to that address. What you want instead is to add tmpFrom * sizeof(int) bytes. To achieve that, you have to either manually calculate required number of bytes based on the value of tmpFrom and the size of int type, or declare data pointer as a pointer to type int. The second is a preferred way to go, but if you really want your functions to support arbitrary data types, then you have to fall back to a harder, first approach.

    Below is a list of warnings generated by clang (it is generally a lot better with diagnostics):

    $ clang -Wall -pedantic -o test ./test.c
    ./test.c:109:18: warning: subscript of a pointer to void is a GNU extension [-pedantic,-Wpointer-arith]
                    memcpy(a, &data[tmpFrom], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:55:36: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       ? __builtin___memcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz0 (dest))     \
                                       ^
    ./test.c:109:13: warning: ISO C forbids taking the address of an expression of type 'void' [-pedantic]
                    memcpy(a, &data[tmpFrom], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:55:36: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       ? __builtin___memcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz0 (dest))     \
                                       ^
    ./test.c:109:18: warning: subscript of a pointer to void is a GNU extension [-pedantic,-Wpointer-arith]
                    memcpy(a, &data[tmpFrom], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:56:33: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       : __inline_memcpy_chk (dest, src, len))
                                    ^
    ./test.c:109:13: warning: ISO C forbids taking the address of an expression of type 'void' [-pedantic]
                    memcpy(a, &data[tmpFrom], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:56:33: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       : __inline_memcpy_chk (dest, src, len))
                                    ^
    ./test.c:111:15: warning: subscript of a pointer to void is a GNU extension [-pedantic,-Wpointer-arith]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpFrom], &data[tmpTo], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:54:21: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
      ((__darwin_obsz0 (dest) != (size_t) -1)                               \
                        ^
    /usr/include/secure/_common.h:38:55: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz0'
    #define __darwin_obsz0(object) __builtin_object_size (object, 0)
                                                          ^~~~~~
    ./test.c:111:10: warning: ISO C forbids taking the address of an expression of type 'void' [-pedantic]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpFrom], &data[tmpTo], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:54:21: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
      ((__darwin_obsz0 (dest) != (size_t) -1)                               \
                        ^
    /usr/include/secure/_common.h:38:55: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz0'
    #define __darwin_obsz0(object) __builtin_object_size (object, 0)
                                                          ^~~~~~
    ./test.c:111:15: warning: subscript of a pointer to void is a GNU extension [-pedantic,-Wpointer-arith]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpFrom], &data[tmpTo], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:55:30: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       ? __builtin___memcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz0 (dest))     \
                                 ^
    ./test.c:111:10: warning: ISO C forbids taking the address of an expression of type 'void' [-pedantic]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpFrom], &data[tmpTo], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:55:30: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       ? __builtin___memcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz0 (dest))     \
                                 ^
    ./test.c:111:31: warning: subscript of a pointer to void is a GNU extension [-pedantic,-Wpointer-arith]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpFrom], &data[tmpTo], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:55:36: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       ? __builtin___memcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz0 (dest))     \
                                       ^
    ./test.c:111:26: warning: ISO C forbids taking the address of an expression of type 'void' [-pedantic]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpFrom], &data[tmpTo], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:55:36: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       ? __builtin___memcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz0 (dest))     \
                                       ^
    ./test.c:111:15: warning: subscript of a pointer to void is a GNU extension [-pedantic,-Wpointer-arith]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpFrom], &data[tmpTo], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:55:62: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       ? __builtin___memcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz0 (dest))     \
                                                                 ^
    /usr/include/secure/_common.h:38:55: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz0'
    #define __darwin_obsz0(object) __builtin_object_size (object, 0)
                                                          ^~~~~~
    ./test.c:111:10: warning: ISO C forbids taking the address of an expression of type 'void' [-pedantic]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpFrom], &data[tmpTo], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:55:62: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       ? __builtin___memcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz0 (dest))     \
                                                                 ^
    /usr/include/secure/_common.h:38:55: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz0'
    #define __darwin_obsz0(object) __builtin_object_size (object, 0)
                                                          ^~~~~~
    ./test.c:111:15: warning: subscript of a pointer to void is a GNU extension [-pedantic,-Wpointer-arith]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpFrom], &data[tmpTo], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:56:27: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       : __inline_memcpy_chk (dest, src, len))
                              ^
    ./test.c:111:10: warning: ISO C forbids taking the address of an expression of type 'void' [-pedantic]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpFrom], &data[tmpTo], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:56:27: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       : __inline_memcpy_chk (dest, src, len))
                              ^
    ./test.c:111:31: warning: subscript of a pointer to void is a GNU extension [-pedantic,-Wpointer-arith]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpFrom], &data[tmpTo], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:56:33: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       : __inline_memcpy_chk (dest, src, len))
                                    ^
    ./test.c:111:26: warning: ISO C forbids taking the address of an expression of type 'void' [-pedantic]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpFrom], &data[tmpTo], szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:56:33: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       : __inline_memcpy_chk (dest, src, len))
                                    ^
    ./test.c:113:15: warning: subscript of a pointer to void is a GNU extension [-pedantic,-Wpointer-arith]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpTo], a, szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:54:21: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
      ((__darwin_obsz0 (dest) != (size_t) -1)                               \
                        ^
    /usr/include/secure/_common.h:38:55: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz0'
    #define __darwin_obsz0(object) __builtin_object_size (object, 0)
                                                          ^~~~~~
    ./test.c:113:10: warning: ISO C forbids taking the address of an expression of type 'void' [-pedantic]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpTo], a, szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:54:21: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
      ((__darwin_obsz0 (dest) != (size_t) -1)                               \
                        ^
    /usr/include/secure/_common.h:38:55: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz0'
    #define __darwin_obsz0(object) __builtin_object_size (object, 0)
                                                          ^~~~~~
    ./test.c:113:15: warning: subscript of a pointer to void is a GNU extension [-pedantic,-Wpointer-arith]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpTo], a, szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:55:30: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       ? __builtin___memcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz0 (dest))     \
                                 ^
    ./test.c:113:10: warning: ISO C forbids taking the address of an expression of type 'void' [-pedantic]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpTo], a, szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:55:30: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       ? __builtin___memcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz0 (dest))     \
                                 ^
    ./test.c:113:15: warning: subscript of a pointer to void is a GNU extension [-pedantic,-Wpointer-arith]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpTo], a, szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:55:62: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       ? __builtin___memcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz0 (dest))     \
                                                                 ^
    /usr/include/secure/_common.h:38:55: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz0'
    #define __darwin_obsz0(object) __builtin_object_size (object, 0)
                                                          ^~~~~~
    ./test.c:113:10: warning: ISO C forbids taking the address of an expression of type 'void' [-pedantic]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpTo], a, szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:55:62: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       ? __builtin___memcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz0 (dest))     \
                                                                 ^
    /usr/include/secure/_common.h:38:55: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz0'
    #define __darwin_obsz0(object) __builtin_object_size (object, 0)
                                                          ^~~~~~
    ./test.c:113:15: warning: subscript of a pointer to void is a GNU extension [-pedantic,-Wpointer-arith]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpTo], a, szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:56:27: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       : __inline_memcpy_chk (dest, src, len))
                              ^
    ./test.c:113:10: warning: ISO C forbids taking the address of an expression of type 'void' [-pedantic]
                    memcpy(&data[tmpTo], a, szblob);
                    ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /usr/include/secure/_string.h:56:27: note: expanded from macro 'memcpy'
       : __inline_memcpy_chk (dest, src, len))
                              ^
    24 warnings generated.
    

    Once the above warnings are fixed, it should have worked. However, there are two more problems…

    The first problem is incorrect expected result. It should be 3, -1, 1, 2 and not 3, -1, 2, 1. The mapping should be sorted like this:

    0,3
    1,0
    2,1
    3,2
    

    And the permutation should be done in four steps:

    1) 2, 3, -1, 1
    2) 3, 2, -1, 1
    3) 3, -1, 2, 1
    4) 3, -1, 1, 2
    

    The second problem is incorrect sorting. By performing two sorts, first on “from” values and second on “to” values, you end up with a mapping sorted only by “to” (the last sort you invoke). What should be done instead is a single sort using a predicate that compares both “from” and “to” of each element. For example:

    int map_comparator(const void *a, const void *b)
    {
        const MapEntry *s1 = a;
        const MapEntry *s2 = b;
        if (*s2->indexFrom != *s1->indexFrom) {
            return *s1->indexFrom - *s2->indexFrom;
        } else {
            return *s1->indexTo - *s2->indexTo;
        }
    }
    

    Once the above is fixed, everything will work. Other than that, there are only few more suggestions to your code that might be helpful:

    1. You are using way too many dynamic allocations. Consider re-thinking how you do it. For example, I don’t see a need to have indexFrom and indexTo fields of MapEntry structure dynamically allocated.
    2. You have unnecessary casts to void *. For example: void * a = (void *)malloc(szblob); should be just void *a = malloc(szblob);.
    3. Unnecessary casts from void * to other pointer types like int *. This is not necessary in C where void * pointer is implicitly convertible to pointers of other types. This is not true for C++, however.
    4. Do not typedef structures unless the goal is to create an opaque type (which is not in your case). Typing struct may seem like a lot of typing, but it serves as a great hints about the type to those C developers who read your code. For example, see Chapter 5 of the Linux Kernel Coding Style for a great explanation.

    I encourage you to fix your code yourself, but here is your code with minimal necessary changes to make it work, for your reference:

    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <stdlib.h>
    #include <string.h>
    #include <math.h>
    #define MAP_SIZE 4
    
    typedef struct MapEntry {
        int * indexFrom;
        int * indexTo;
    } MapEntry;
    
    typedef MapEntry * Map;
    
    int permute(void *data, int nblobs, int szblob, const Map map);
    
    void build_map(Map);
    void build_data(int *);
    int is_map_valid(Map);
    void print_map(Map);
    int is_valid(Map);
    
    int map_comparator(const void * a, const void * b);
    
    int main(int argc, char const *argv[])
    {
        int nblobs, * data, i;
        size_t szblob;
        Map map = (Map)malloc(sizeof(Map));
        data = (int *) malloc(sizeof(int) * 4);
    
        build_map(map);
    
        data[0] = 1;
        data[1] = 3;
        data[2] = -1;
        data[3] = 2;
    
        nblobs = 4;
        szblob = sizeof(int);
    
        if (!permute(data, nblobs, szblob, map)) {
            printf("Invalid Map\n");
            return 0;
        }
    
        i = 0;
        for (i = 0; i < szblob; ++i) {
            printf("%d ", data[i]);
        }
    
        return 0;
    }
    
    void print_map(Map map){
        int i;
        for (i = 0; i < MAP_SIZE; ++i) {
            printf("[%d - %d]\n", *map[i].indexFrom, *map[i].indexTo);
        }
    }
    
    int map_comparator(const void *a, const void *b)
    {
        const MapEntry *s1 = a;
        const MapEntry *s2 = b;
        if (*s2->indexFrom != *s1->indexFrom) {
            return *s1->indexFrom - *s2->indexFrom;
        } else {
            return *s1->indexTo - *s2->indexTo;
        }
    }
    
    int is_map_valid(Map map) {
        int i,j;
        for (i = 1; i < MAP_SIZE; ++i){
            j = i - 1;
            if (*map[j].indexFrom == *map[i].indexFrom)
                return 0;
            if (*map[j].indexTo == *map[i].indexTo)
                return 0;
        }
        return 1;
    }
    
    int is_valid(Map map) {
        qsort(map, MAP_SIZE, sizeof(MapEntry), map_comparator);
        if (!is_map_valid(map)) return 0;
        return 1;
    }
    
    
    int permute(void *data, int nblobs, int szblob, const Map map){
        int i, tmpFrom, tmpTo;
        void * a = (void *)malloc(szblob);
        char *p = data;
    
        /* check if map has duplicate keys */
        /* sort the list, then check whether or not the map is valid */
        if (!is_valid(map)) return 0;
        /* where issues occur */
    
        for (i = 0; i < nblobs; ++i){
    
            tmpFrom = *map[i].indexFrom;
    
            tmpTo = *map[i].indexTo;
    
            memcpy(a, &p[tmpFrom*szblob], szblob);
    
            memcpy(&p[tmpFrom*szblob], &p[tmpTo*szblob], szblob);
    
            memcpy(&p[tmpTo*szblob], a, szblob);
    
        }
    
        return 1;
    
    }
    /* build mapping */
    void build_map(Map map){
        int i;
        for (i = 0; i < MAP_SIZE; ++i) {
            map[i].indexFrom = (int *)malloc(sizeof(int));
            map[i].indexTo = (int *)malloc(sizeof(int));
        }
    
        *map[0].indexFrom = 0;
        *map[0].indexTo = 3;
    
        *map[1].indexFrom = 3;
        *map[1].indexTo = 2;
    
        *map[2].indexFrom = 2;
        *map[2].indexTo = 1;
    
        *map[3].indexFrom = 1;
        *map[3].indexTo = 0;
    
    }
    

    Hope it helps. Stay warm and Good Luck!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a function out there to make sure that any given array conforms
This problem is taken from interviewstreet.com Given array of integers Y=y1,...,yn, we have n
Given an unsorted integer array, and without making any assumptions on the numbers in
For any given NSManagedObject, is there any method to return a set or array
Given an array of integers A[1...n-1] where N is the length of array A.
Given an array like this: Array => ( [0] => 1, [1] => 2,
Given the string string[] and asked to get the underlying Type for this class,
The PHP array type is actually more akin to an an ordered map than
I am trying to read a file type that has a mixture of integers,
Possible Duplicate: Size of struct with a single element Given any type A and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.