Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8483357
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T20:04:50+00:00 2026-06-10T20:04:50+00:00

Given an infinite length sorted array having both positive and negative integers. Find an

  • 0

Given an infinite length sorted array having both positive and negative integers. Find an element in it.

EDIT
All the elements in the array are unique and the array in infinite in right direction.

There are two approaches:

Approach 1:

Set the index at position 100, if the element to be found is less, binary search in the previous 100 items, else set the next index at position 200. In this way, keep on increasing the index by 100 until the item is greater.

Approach 2:

Set the index in power of 2. First set the index at position 2, then 4, then 8, then 16 and so on. Again do the binary search from position 2^K to 2^(K + 1) where item is in between.

Which of the two approaches will be better both in best case and worst case?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T20:04:52+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 8:04 pm

    The first approach will be linear in the index of the element (O(k) where k is the index of the element). Actually, you are going to need k/100 iterations to find the element which is greater than the searched element, which is O(k).

    The second approach will be logarithmic in the same index. O(logk). (where k is the index of the element). In here, you are going to need log(k) iterations until you find the higher element. Then binary search between 2^(i-1), 2^i (where i is the iteration number), will be logarithmic as well, totaling in O(logk)

    Thus, the second is more efficient.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

1) Given an array of integers (negative and positive) - what is the most
I'm trying to add infinite scroll functionality to a page using code given in
This is purely a theory question, so, given an "infinite" time to make a
i have created a coverflow using the code given by http://android.jmsliu.com/138/android-infinite-loop-gallery.html . And it
Given a starting number, imagine an infinite sequence of its successive halves. 1, 0.5,
Fromg Google's Python Class: E. Given two lists sorted in increasing order, create and
Learning clojure, trying to create a lazy infinite sequence of all prime numbers. I'm
I have implemented a code that generate the infinite sequence given the base case
Given a finite list of elements, how can I create a (lazily-evaluated, thanks LINQ!)
I need to generate an infinite stream of random integers, with numbers to be

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.