Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 763025
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T16:29:37+00:00 2026-05-14T16:29:37+00:00

Given an integer x, how would you return an integer y that is lower

  • 0

Given an integer x, how would you return an integer y that is lower than or equal to x and a multiple of 64?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T16:29:37+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 4:29 pm

    Simply and it with the bit inversion of (64-1):

    x = x & ~63
    // 64  is 000...0001000000
    // 63  is 000...0000111111
    // ~63 is 111...1111000000
    

    This basically clears out the lower six bits which is the same as rounding it down to a multiple of 64. Be aware that this will round towards negative infinity for negative numbers, not towards zero, but that seems to be what your question requires.

    You can see the behaviour here in this multiple-of-four variant:

    #include <stdio.h>
    int main (void) {
        int i;
        for (i = -10; i <= 10; i++) {
            printf ("%3d -> %3d\n", i, i & ~3);
        }
        return 0;
    }
    

    This produces:

    -10 -> -12
     -9 -> -12
     -8 ->  -8
     -7 ->  -8
     -6 ->  -8
     -5 ->  -8
     -4 ->  -4
     -3 ->  -4
     -2 ->  -4
     -1 ->  -4
      0 ->   0
      1 ->   0
      2 ->   0
      3 ->   0
      4 ->   4
      5 ->   4
      6 ->   4
      7 ->   4
      8 ->   8
      9 ->   8
     10 ->   8
    

    Keep in mind this only works for powers of two (like 26 = 64) and two’s complement (the ISO standard doesn’t mandate that representation – see here for details – but I’ve never seen an C environment that doesn’t use it and I’ve worked on systems from the puniest 8051 to the largest mainframes). If you want to use any other number for the divisor, you should probably use the proper math functions like floor.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 384k
  • Answers 384k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Since there has been no activity on this, leaving this… May 14, 2026 at 11:12 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This game is entirely F# + SIlverlight (no C#), has… May 14, 2026 at 11:12 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer include Devise::TestHelpers doesn't go in the test_helper.rb file, but rather… May 14, 2026 at 11:12 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.