Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6086751
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T11:47:29+00:00 2026-05-23T11:47:29+00:00

Given that disk space is cheap, does it make sense to normalize data (1NF)

  • 0

Given that disk space is cheap, does it make sense to normalize data (1NF) rather than store it all in one place for faster queries?

Background:

  1. We have a table of users – event organizers and event attendees
  2. Both have some common fields, but organizers have many more fields
  3. Attendees are far more numerous than organizers on the site

Question: (In the far past) We combined the separate tables which existed and made them into one similar to the following:

   Table_Users
   UID, Name, Email, CommonField1, OrgSpecificField1, OrgSpecificField2

Now, we have only one common table for both types of users. For attendees, the last two fields are NULL.

Compare the above structure to:

   Table_Users
   UID, Name, Email, CommonField1

   Table_UsersOrganizers
   UID, OrgSpecificField1, OrgSpecificField2

which would necessitate a JOIN. Now, from the site speed perspective, which would be faster to retrieve – the common-integrated table or the separated one? Remember that we would be constantly fetching these records.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T11:47:30+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 11:47 am

    If you are talking about the site speed in fetching data, then it is definitely the second choice (the separated table)
    The data retrieving time is mainly about the number of entries in the table (number of rows) which will be less in the separated ones

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an app that get ftp disk space. so space given by a
Given that indexing is so important as your data set increases in size, can
Given that Decimal.MaxValue = 79228162514264337593543950335m Why does the next line give me 7922816251426433759354395034M in
Given that working features are better value for a company than good code at
Given that I have the appropriate rights, how can I get performance data (ie.
I have a class that does operations on file's on a disk. More exactly
How can I see all disk usage of all my databases on a given
Given that Chrome and Safari use webkit has anyone yet found anything that renders
Given that a function a_method has been defined like def a_method(arg1, arg2): pass Starting
Given that I only have one monitor, what's the best way to debug a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.