Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 727695
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T06:35:49+00:00 2026-05-14T06:35:49+00:00

Given the class Ninja, with a specified binding in the Ninject kernel I can

  • 0

Given the class Ninja, with a specified binding in the Ninject kernel I can resolve an object doing this:

var ninja = ninject.Get<Ninja>();

But why can’t I do this:

Type ninjaType = typeof(Ninja); 
var ninja = ninject.Get<ninjaType>();

What’s the correct way of specifying the type outside the call to Get?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T06:35:49+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:35 am

    Specifying type arguments is not a runtime thing, it’s statically compiled. The type must be known at compile time. In your scenario, it is potentially unknown, or computed at runtime. Through reflection it is possible to construct a method call where you specify the type arguments, but it’s unlikely you want to do that.

    Also, most containers should have an overload that would look something like this:

    Type ninjaType = typeof(Ninja); 
    var ninja = (Ninja)ninject.Get(ninjaType);
    

    Finally, most containers should provide ways to specify in the container configuration, which type should be provided on certain conditions. I know that Ninject has a pretty DSL to conditionally specify which type should be returned under what circumstances. This would mean however, to code against an abstraction and let the container decide what is returned:

    class DependencyConsumer {
      ctor(IWarrior warrior) {
        //Warrior could be a ninja, because e.g. you told NInject
        //that the dependency should be filled that way for this class
      }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 357k
  • Answers 357k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You probably want to call setlocale() first, "LC_ALL" should do… May 14, 2026 at 9:06 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Linux Ubuntu Desktop Jaunty Firebug FireCookie Pixel Perfect Web developer… May 14, 2026 at 9:06 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your code should look like this: var par = [];… May 14, 2026 at 9:06 am

Related Questions

Given the class Foo with an old-style constructor class Foo { public function Foo()
Given the class below, public class ClassOne { public static void main(String... args) {
Given the following in PHP: <?php class foo { public $bar; function __construct() {
How could I go about calling a method on a static class given the
Given the following code, will ixAdd do what you'd expect, i. e. return the

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.