Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1020397
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T11:09:39+00:00 2026-05-16T11:09:39+00:00

Given the code below, wich is a very trimmed down version of the actual

  • 0

Given the code below, wich is a very trimmed down version of the actual code, I get the following error:

[DCC Error] Unit3.pas(31): E2010 Incompatible types: ‘IXList<Unit3.TXList<T>.FindAll.S>’ and ‘TXList<Unit3.TXList<T>.FindAll.S>’

In the FindAll<S> function.

I can’t really see why since there is no problem with the previous very similar function.

Can anyone shed some light on it?
Is it me or is it a bug in the compiler?

unit Unit3;

interface
uses Generics.Collections;

type
  IXList<T> = interface
  end;

  TXList<T: class> = class(TList<T>, IXList<T>)
  protected
    FRefCount: Integer;
    function QueryInterface(const IID: TGUID; out Obj): HResult; stdcall;
    function _AddRef: Integer; stdcall;
    function _Release: Integer; stdcall;
  public
    function Find: IXList<T>;
    function FindAll<S>: IXList<S>;
  end;

implementation
uses Windows;

function TXList<T>.Find: IXList<T>;
begin
  Result := TXList<T>.Create;
end;

function TXList<T>.FindAll<S>: IXList<S>;
begin
  Result := TXList<S>.Create; // Error here  
end;

function TXList<T>.QueryInterface(const IID: TGUID; out Obj): HResult;
begin
  Result := E_NoInterface;
end;

function TXList<T>._AddRef: Integer;
begin
  InterlockedIncrement(FRefCount);
end;

function TXList<T>._Release: Integer;
begin
  InterlockedDecrement(FRefCount);
  if FRefCount = 0 then Self.Destroy;
end;

end.

Thanks for the answers!
It seems like a compiler bug with an acceptable workaround available.

With the interface declared as

IXList<T: class> = interface
   function GetEnumerator: TList<T>.TEnumerator;
end;

and findall implemented as

function TXList<T>.FindAll<S>: IXList<S>;
var
  lst: TXList<S>;
  i: T;
begin
  lst := TXList<S>.Create;
  for i in Self do
    if i.InheritsFrom(S) then lst.Add(S(TObject(i)));

  Result := IXList<S>(IUnknown(lst));
end;

I got it working in a simple example.

Doing something like:

var
  l: TXList<TAClass>;
  i: TASubclassOfTAClass;
begin
.
.
.
for i in l.FindAll<TASubclassOfTAClass> do
begin
   // Do something with i
end;
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T11:09:39+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 11:09 am

    With three minor modification (IInterface, FindAll with “S: class” [Thanks Mason] and the typecasts in FindAll) I got it compiling.

    Full code:

    unit Unit16;
    
    interface
    
    uses
      Generics.Collections;
    
    type
      IXList<T> = interface
      end;
    
      TXList<T: class> = class(TList<T>, IInterface, IXList<T>)
      protected
        FRefCount: Integer;
        function QueryInterface(const IID: TGUID; out Obj): HResult; stdcall;
        function _AddRef: Integer; stdcall;
        function _Release: Integer; stdcall;
      public
        function Find: IXList<T>;
        function FindAll<S: class>: IXList<S>;
      end;
    
    implementation
    uses Windows;
    
    function TXList<T>.Find: IXList<T>;
    begin
      Result := TXList<T>.Create;
    end;
    
    function TXList<T>.FindAll<S>: IXList<S>;
    begin
      Result := IXList<S>(IUnknown(TXList<S>.Create));
    end;
    
    function TXList<T>.QueryInterface(const IID: TGUID; out Obj): HResult;
    begin
      Result := E_NoInterface;
    end;
    
    function TXList<T>._AddRef: Integer;
    begin
      InterlockedIncrement(FRefCount);
    end;
    
    function TXList<T>._Release: Integer;
    begin
      InterlockedDecrement(FRefCount);
      if FRefCount = 0 then Self.Destroy;
    end;
    
    end.
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Where is the proper place to perform validation given the following scenario/code below: In
I tried the following code in LINQPad and got the results given below: List<string>
The code below gives me this mysterious error, and i cannot fathom it. I
The code below gives an error: Property 'Int32 Key' is not defined for type
Given the code bellow, how do I style the radio buttons to be next
I've worked on many projects where I've been given code by others to update.
Given the code from the Complex Form part III how would you go about
Given the code: new Thread(new BackgroundWorker()).start(); Intuitively it feels like the BackgroundWorker instance should
I've been given some code with commenting unlike anything I've come across before: //{{{
I was given this code a while back. I finally got around to testing

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.