Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7030519
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T00:40:52+00:00 2026-05-28T00:40:52+00:00

Given the following C++ code: struct foo { // Some definition with copy constructor.

  • 0

Given the following C++ code:

struct foo {
  // Some definition with copy constructor.
};

const foo &getData();

const foo &alt1(getData());
const foo &alt2 = getData();

Will a reasonable compiler produce different code for alt1 and alt2? In other words, will alt1 cause the copy constructor to be run, or is the compiler allowed to optimize that away and assign the reference directly?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T00:40:53+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 12:40 am

    In both cases, you initialize a reference (not an object), so no copy-constructor will be run.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given the following code: public struct Foo { public Foo(int bar, int baz) :
Given the following: struct Foo { int bar() const; }; struct IsEqual : public
Given the following: struct Foo { int bar() const; }; struct IsEqual : public
Given the following C++ code, #ifdef __cplusplus extern C { #endif struct foo {
Given the following code: class foo { }; class bar: public foo { public:
please consider the following code: template <typename T> struct foo { template <typename S>
Given the following code: #include <iostream> struct implicit_t { implicit_t(int x) : x_m(x) {
Given the following code: #include <boost/noncopyable.hpp> enum Error { ERR_OK=0 }; struct Filter :
The following code: template <typename S, typename T> struct foo { void bar(); };
Given the following struct: public struct Foo<T> { public Foo(T obj) { } public

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.