Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 624531
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T19:12:38+00:00 2026-05-13T19:12:38+00:00

Given the following code, is there a better way to structure this? foreach(Thing item

  • 0

Given the following code, is there a better way to structure this?

foreach(Thing item in SomeRandomList)
{
    bool firstCondition = CalculateBool(item, someValue);
    bool secondCondition = CalculateBool(item, someOtherValue);

    //General things are done...
    if(firstCondition || secondCondition)
    {
        //semi-specific things are done...
        if(firstCondition)
        {
            //specific things are done...
        } 
        else
        {
            //specific things are done...
        }
    }
}

Also, what if there are more conditions, i.e. 3:

foreach(Thing item in SomeRandomList)
{
    bool firstCondition = CalculateBool(item, someValue);
    bool secondCondition = CalculateBool(item, someOtherValue);
    //imagine as many more as you want.
    bool nthCondition = CalculateBool(item, lastOtherValue);

    //General things are done...
    if(firstCondition || secondCondition || nthCondition)
    {
        //semi-specific things are done...
        if(firstCondition)
        {
            //specific things are done...
        } 
        else if(secondCondition)
        {
            //specific things are done...
        }
        else
        { 
            //specific things are done...
        }
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T19:12:38+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:12 pm

    If you can do the semi-specific things after the specific ones, you could try this:

    bool anyTrue = true;
    
    if (firstCondition)
    {
        // Specific things
    }
    else if (secondCondition)
    {
        // Specific things
    }
    else
    {
        // Specific things
        anyTrue = false;
    }
    
    if (anyTrue)
    {
        // Semi-specific things
    }
    

    I don’t know if it’s necessarily better, but it’s different…

    Alternatively, I’m not all up on C# 3.0 and the fancy new LINQ stuff, but if its expressive enough you could try something like (pseudo-code):

    bool[] conditions =
    {
        CalculateBool(item, someValue),
        CalculateBool(item, someOtherValue),
        ...
    };
    
    if (conditions.AnyTrue)
    {
        switch (conditions.IndexOfFirstTrueItem)
        {
            case 0:
                // Specific things
                break;
    
            case 1:
                // Specific things
                break;
    
            default:
                // Specific things
                break;
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given the following code, is there a way I can call class A's version
Given the following php code... <?php exec('myscript.php'); exec('finish.php'); ?> Is there a way to
Given the following code: $(.force-selection).blur(function() { var value = $('matched-item').val(); //check if the input's
Given the following code: function Person(firstName, lastName) { this.FirstName = firstName; this.LastName = lastName;
Given the following code: string source = Some Unicode String; foreach( char value in
gcc 4.4.4 c89 Is there a better way to do this? I have the
Is there any better to way to check if I can receive a given
when i am analyze my project following code gives me leakage warning. is there
There is a problem with the following code. I need it to give access
Given the following code: final class retVal { int photo_id; } Gson gson =

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.