Question

Given the following HTML:

<div class="foo">howdy howdy howdy how</div>
<div class="bar">Hello</div>​

and the following CSS:

.foo {
    background-color:green;
    overflow:hidden;
    height:.75em;
}

.bar {
    color: white;
    background-color: red;
    margin-top: -10px;
    width: 200px;
}

The layer order is something like this:

Here’s the associated jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/q3J8D/

I would expect the red background to be on top of the black text and don’t understand why the black text is on top of the red background.

I can fix this problem using position: relative, but I’m just curious.

Why is the black text on top of the red background?

I’m particularly looking for an official source/standard that explains this behaviour.

Answer 1

It took me a while to understand it, even after reading the spec multiple times, and BoltClock’s answer to the linked question.

But it seems the explanation is simple: since these are two static (i.e. non-positioned), block-level elements inside the same stacking context (the root context), they are drawn in the following order:

• background of #foo
• background of #bar
• text content of #foo
• text content of #bar

Thus, the output we see in the question.

The paint order is dictated by an algorithm described in Appendix E of the CSS 2.1 spec. What is not in the appendix (but is mentioned here), is that the algorithm is applied recursively for each stacking context (not each element).