Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 737705
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T07:45:08+00:00 2026-05-14T07:45:08+00:00

Given the following HTML example… <div id=’div1′>div one</div> <div id=’div2′>div two</div> …I found that

  • 0

Given the following HTML example…

<div id='div1'>div one</div>
<div id='div2'>div two</div>

…I found that the following jQuery code…

$('#div1').click(function() {

    var $d = $(this);    // Using 'this' instead of '#div1'

    $d.add('#div2').remove();
});

…would not add #div2 to the set referenced by $d, but this code…

$('#div1').click(function() {

    var $d = $('#div1');    // Using '#div1' instead of 'this'

    $d.add('#div2').remove();
});

…successfully added #div2.

Upon consulting firebug, I found that using $(this) gave the jQuery object a context of #div1, but doing $('#div1') gave the object a context of document.

Given this information I tried…

var $d = $(this, document);

…and the add() function worked as expected.

So here’s the question. Could someone please explain to my why a different context is assigned when using $(this) vs $('#div1')?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T07:45:08+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 7:45 am

    Edited to better address your question:
    First, look at the relevant code here, this is how jQuery handles the $() call. When you’re passing a DOM element (which this is, it’s the div itself) the context is the DOM element itself, this better allows handling of document fragments, etc. When you pass a string, the default context is document (because it’s the top ancestor to search from). Remember a $(selector, context) is actually calling context.find(selector) under the covers, so it makes sense to start at document if nothing’s specified.

    Note: you can always check the context, it’s an available property, like this: $(this).context

    For the .add() behavior:
    .add() uses the same context for selecting as the jQuery element you’re adding to, so what you’re seeing is the expected behavior. For a better description, see how .add() is written:

    add: function( selector, context ) {
        var set = typeof selector === "string" ?
                    jQuery( selector, context || this.context ) :
                    jQuery.makeArray( selector ),
                    all = jQuery.merge( this.get(), set );
    
        return this.pushStack( isDisconnected( set[0] ) || isDisconnected( all[0] ) ?
                all :
                jQuery.unique( all ) );
        }
    

    Note how it uses the current context if none is passed. To override this though, it accepts a context, to which you can pass document and get the result you want, like this:

    $('#div1').click(function() {
       $(this).add('#div2', document).remove();
    });
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 464k
  • Answers 464k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The WYSIWYG editor may be hiding the PHP because it… May 16, 2026 at 12:56 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Depends on what you want to do. There are several… May 16, 2026 at 12:56 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Javascript code doesn't belong in the action attribute. You can… May 16, 2026 at 12:56 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.