Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8545103
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T12:42:57+00:00 2026-06-11T12:42:57+00:00

Given these two tables: A.a B.b – – 1 3 2 4 3 5

  • 0

Given these two tables:

A.a   B.b
-     -
1     3
2     4
3     5
4     6

If I want a cross matching I can do both

SELECT * FROM A, B WHERE A.a = B.b; # and
SELECT * FROM A INNER JOIN B ON (A.a = B.b)

Or if I want a LEFT OUTER JOIN or RIGHT OUTER JOIN

SELECT * FROM A,B WHERE A.a = B.b(+); # and
SELECT * FROM A LEFT OUTER JOIN B ON (A.a = B.b)

But are there any engine/performance differences between query statements?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T12:42:58+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 12:42 pm

    They most likely generate the same plan on modern RDBMS. The JOIN syntax is the ANSI SQL syntax since 1992.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given these two queries: Select t1.id, t2.companyName from table1 t1 INNER JOIN table2 t2
Given the following: select * from a; select * from b; Are these two
These two querys gives me the exact same result: select * from topics where
Given these two tables: Foo (id, name) -- PK = id Bar (fooId, value)
Lets say I have two tables - Person and Clothes and both of these
I need to select the counts from two tables that share a common column
This is easier to explain with an example. Given these two classes: public class
Given the Java code below, what's the closest you could represent these two static
There are two polygons given. how can one determine whether one polygon is inside,
There is a points given in two dimensional plane and I want to count

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.