Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7674617
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T16:46:40+00:00 2026-05-31T16:46:40+00:00

Given this class: class First def to_s ; Hello World ; end end and

  • 0

Given this class:

class First
  def to_s ; "Hello World" ; end
end

and this spec:

require 'first'

describe First do
  describe "#to_s" do
    it { should == "Hello World" }
  end
end

I get:

Failures:

  1) First#to_s 
     Failure/Error: it { should == "Hello World" }
       expected: "Hello World"
            got: Hello World (using ==)
       Diff:
       @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
       -"Hello World"
       +Hello World
     # ./spec/first_spec.rb:5:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'

But I would expect this to pass. My questions are:

  • How would a passing spec look like?
  • Why is this spec not passing, specifically?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T16:46:42+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 4:46 pm

    Your outer describe block:

    describe First do
    

    sets the subject of the inner examples to be an instance of First. That is, all of the its you’re describing will be a First object. The text #to_s example doesn’t instruct rspec to call to_s on the object.

    Since First.new is not equal to "Hello World" the spec fails.

    However, since rspec does call to_s on the object to output it in the failure description, “Hello World” does appear there. You could try the following to ensure that the string conversion is being tested:

    its(:to_s) { should == "Hello World" }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given this object class Contact { public IEnumerable<Person> People { get; } public string
Given this definition: [UniqueId(Ident)] public class MyClass : MyBase { public int Ident{ get;
Given a class like this: class B class << self attr_accessor :var end end
Given this: Interface IBase {string X {get;set;}} Interface ISuper {string Y {get;set;}} class Base
Given this class class Foo { // Want to find _bar with reflection [SomeAttribute]
Given this class public partial class Default : Page { private IRepository repo; ...
given this class definition: public class Frame { IFrameStream CapturedFrom; } I want implement
Given this class: class C { private: struct Foo { int key1, key2, value;
Given a class like this: class Foo { public: Foo(int); Foo(const Foo&); Foo& operator=(int);
Given a declaration like this: class A { public: void Foo() const; }; What

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.