Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 649033
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T21:53:55+00:00 2026-05-13T21:53:55+00:00

Good afternoon, I am currently starting to think & prototype about a (.net based)

  • 0

Good afternoon,

I am currently starting to think & prototype about a (.net based) new project which will use MEF extensively and one part will be to plug in new ‘storage’ types besides a normal file/directory storage (e.g. using scms (clearcase, perforce etc), SAP EDM for long term archiving, OpenText LiveLink etc). Now all of them have the same minimum requirement of R(/W) access, but I need a common format to address all these. I was thinking of using something URI-alike file:// & https:// (livelink uses http(s) for transportation aswell) etc are a common base for all normal ones, but I was wondering whether .Net has functionality to declare new URI types built-in?

What I mean is e.g. that I’d use a similiar format e.g. for clearcase as in ‘clearcase:////’ or ‘sap://identifier’ etc etc…

So basically what I am asking and haven’t found yet is whether .Net allows me to declare new URI types with its Uri handling classes so I don’t have to re-invent the wheel there?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T21:53:55+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:53 pm

    The Uri type itself can handle strange URI schemes, like your clearcase:// and sap:// examples above. The Uri.Scheme property treats these as plain strings.

    There are other answers to ‘does .NET support custom URIs?’, but those depend on what you want to do with them.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.