Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1102881
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T01:15:19+00:00 2026-05-17T01:15:19+00:00

Got a style conflict between StyleCop and Resharper. Stylecop 1303 says that const vars

  • 0

Got a style conflict between StyleCop and Resharper.
Stylecop 1303 says that const vars should start uppercase and I agree.
Resharper says OK for class-wide const declarations, but when using a const in a local (e.g. method) scope, Reshaper doesn’t approve and wants to make everything camelCasing.

Of course no problem to disable this rule in R#, but what could be the reason behind this rule? Anyone any thoughts?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T01:15:20+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 1:15 am

    If you download Stylecop for Resharper then it comes with a Resharper settings file that will fix this for you. It’s also a great way to get Resharper to help you with Stylecop compliance:

    http://stylecopforresharper.codeplex.com/

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've got style resources in WPF working so that in my App.xaml I can
I've got an asp.net ajax style AccordionPane control that I am trying to get/set
I've got an HTML select box that I need to style. I'd prefer to
I've got a fancy-schmancy worksheet style view in a Rails app that is taking
I've got a simple button with a single css-style, like this: <button style=text-decoration:underline>That's a
On my website I've got a style (class=more) that is overrunning its bounds and
I've got a tr:table that I need to style using CSS. All the normal
I've got a lot of older code that uses the old-style pascal object type
I've got a div#element that I'm changing css style in interval using jquery. var
I've got a collection of ViewModels that are rendered as tabs using a style

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.