Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7051149
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T03:13:45+00:00 2026-05-28T03:13:45+00:00

Guice’s stack traces can get so verbose that they are very painful to read.

  • 0

Guice’s stack traces can get so verbose that they are very painful to read. Here’s an example:

1) No implementation for java.util.Set<com.mydomain.myapp.android.activities.catbrowser.generalizedbrowser.listview.helpers.databaseitem.itemmanipulators.ItemManipulator<com.mydomain.myapp.flash.Cat>> annotated with @com.google.inject.assistedinject.Assisted(value=) was bound.
  while locating java.util.Set<com.mydomain.myapp.android.activities.catbrowser.generalizedbrowser.listview.helpers.databaseitem.itemmanipulators.ItemManipulator<com.mydomain.myapp.flash.Cat>> annotated with @com.google.inject.assistedinject.Assisted(value=)

…

If I could hide the classpath, it would look like:

1) No implementation for Set<ItemManipulator<Cat>> annotated with @Assisted(value=) was bound.
  while locating Set<ItemManipulator<Cat>> annotated with @Assisted(value=)

Is there any way to configure Guice to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T03:13:46+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 3:13 am

    So the answer is no.

    If you take look at guice source code you will find com.google.inject.internal.Errors class that is responsible for building error messages. In this class it is coded that the Key is converting the following way:

      new Converter<Key>(Key.class) {
        public String toString(Key key) {
          if (key.getAnnotationType() != null) {
            return key.getTypeLiteral() + " annotated with "
                + (key.getAnnotation() != null ? key.getAnnotation() : key.getAnnotationType());
          } else {
            return key.getTypeLiteral().toString();
          }
        }
      }
    

    Next step is to take a look at TypeLiteral#toString method:

      @Override public final String toString() {
        return MoreTypes.typeToString(type);
      }
    

    Where MoreTypes#typeToString is a static method that cannot be configured

      public static String typeToString(Type type) {
        return type instanceof Class ? ((Class) type).getName() : type.toString();
      }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

It seems to me that Guice implementation is doing some very tricky things when
I'm trying Guice. I made a simple example which is very similar to the
(x-posted to guice mailing list) I'm trialling Guice on a new library that will
I gave to Google Guice the responsibility of wiring my objects. But, how can
Guice Singletons are weird for me First I thought that IService ser = Guice.createInjector().getInstance(IService.class);
I've configured my GWT app with Guice as documented here . With this setup
I have a Google Appengine/Guice/Wicket Application. My problem is that due to the mapping
I have some Guice binding code using generics that compiles and functions fine from
I've read about Google Guice, and understand the general issues with other approaches to
I'm having some troubles understanding how Guice's singleton instantiations works. I've read the available

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.