Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 583705
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T14:49:15+00:00 2026-05-13T14:49:15+00:00

GWT doesn’t serialize Java Date properly. When I tried sending Date created in Javascript

  • 0

GWT doesn’t serialize Java Date properly. When I tried sending Date created in Javascript through the wire, I found out that dates between April 1st (funny) and 25th October for years before year 1983 get subtracted by one day.

That means that, say, both 1982-04-01 and 1982-03-31 become 1982-03-31 on the Java side.

Given the dates in question, I would guess that this is some kind of DST problem. I’ve tried googling, and found only one other reference that describes similar problem.

I also tried submitting bug to the GWT team, but curiously wasn’t able to find bugtracker for GWT.

So, my questions are:

  1. Anyone else run into this? I’m on GWT 1.7, and would like to confirm if this happens on 2.0 as well.

  2. My workaround was to send dates as Strings, and parse them on server. Anyone knows better workaround?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T14:49:15+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 2:49 pm

    Assuming that you are using a java.util.Date

    Question 1: It seems that it is fixed in 2.0. I’ve created both Dates above (1982-04-01 and 1982-03-31) and they come through correctly to the server (both represent on the server as 1982-04-01 and 1982-03-31 respectively). My setup is:

    • GWT 2.0
    • Java 1.6
    • OSX 10.6.2

    Question 2: You could always pass the ‘milliseconds since January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 GMT’ over the async service-which you can get using getTime() on the date object. On the server side you can then instantiate a new Date passing this value in on the constructor:
    Date date = new Date(millis);
    This saves fiddling around with formatters and parsers.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 406k
  • Answers 406k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Hmm, ok that's suprising but I got it. The problem… May 15, 2026 at 6:05 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The VS2010 does a decent optimization job on the equivalent… May 15, 2026 at 6:05 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Or, you can give a common class to all the… May 15, 2026 at 6:05 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.