Had the idea I’d seen at least one.
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
It’s supported by the common language runtime (CLR) but not by the .NET languages that Microsoft has included in Visual Studio. The only .NET “language” that currently supports this is IL. I’m not aware of any functions in the framework which exhibit this, but even if there were there they would not be common language specification (CLS) compliant. Read Richter’s excellent .NET book for more information.
EDIT: A good example is conversion operators. Where there exists an explicit or implicit conversion of a type to more than one other data type, these will be compiled into IL as methods differing only in their return types.