Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 822009
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T02:44:11+00:00 2026-05-15T02:44:11+00:00

Handling integer overflow is a common task, but what’s the best way to handle

  • 0

Handling integer overflow is a common task, but what’s the best way to handle it in C#? Is there some syntactic sugar to make it simpler than with other languages? Or is this really the best way?

int x = foo();
int test = x * common;
if(test / common != x)
    Console.WriteLine("oh noes!");
else
    Console.WriteLine("safe!");
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T02:44:12+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 2:44 am

    I haven’t needed to use this often, but you can use the checked keyword:

    int x = foo();
    int test = checked(x * common);
    

    Will result in a runtime exception if overflows. From MSDN:

    In a checked context, if an expression produces a value that is
    outside the range of the destination type, the result depends on
    whether the expression is constant or non-constant. Constant
    expressions cause compile time errors, while non-constant expressions
    are evaluated at run time and raise exceptions.

    I should also point out that there is another C# keyword, unchecked, which of course does the opposite of checked and ignores overflows. You might wonder when you’d ever use unchecked since it appears to be the default behavior. Well, there is a C# compiler option that defines how expressions outside of checked and unchecked are handled: /checked. You can set it under the advanced build settings of your project.

    If you have a lot of expressions that need to be checked, the simplest thing to do would actually be to set the /checked build option. Then any expression that overflows, unless wrapped in unchecked, would result in a runtime exception.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What's the best way to handle a visitor constructing their own URL and replacing
I've implemented a plotting class that is currently capable of handling integer values only.
I would like to know if there is a package in R handling non
Ok, so PHP isn't the best language to be dealing with arbitrarily large integers
Im handling various email addresses that come in the following forms John Doe <5555555555@mail.com>
It is known how to catch the float division-by-zero exception with the usage of
i have bit of code that causes an underflow: var t1, t2, delta: DWORD:
Does anyone know how to pass a several bytes into a Binary (or varbinary)
Code snippet: Dim target As Object ' target gets properly set to something of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.