Home/ Questions/Q 8770747
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-13T17:37:07+00:00

Has anyone ever done a straight up apple to apple comparison between: A C++

  • 0

Has anyone ever done a straight up apple to apple comparison between:

  1. A C++ application calling an algorithm done in a R functions using RInside
  2. A C++ application calling the equivelant algorithm but using a one of the math libraries like GSL, LAPACK, or CBLAS?

I am trying to get benchmarks which would be faster. I am also interested in what kind of parallalzation/multithreading designs that might make the calculate faster within C++?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Aside from startup costs for initializing R which you only get in case 1) by your study design, the results should be identical as R itself uses the exactly same BLAS AND LAPACK libraries if built correctly.

    I have a to-be updated package / vignette which proposes a benchmarking framework for exactly these questions as the issue is so easy to misunderstand — see the CRAN page for gcbd as well as the corresponding pdf vignette.

    If you build R differently (eg statically, or with its own BLAS / LAPACK sources), then you are getting different results but you are also not making an apples-to-apples comparison.

    • 0