Home/ Questions/Q 3785180
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-19T11:29:20+00:00

Has anyone had any success reading S3 buckets as subfolders? folder1 — subfolder2 —-

  • 0

Has anyone had any success reading S3 buckets as subfolders?

folder1

— subfolder2

—- file3

—- file4

— file1

— file2

folder2

— subfolder3

— file5

— file6

My task is to read folder1. I expect to see subfolder2, file1 and file2, but NOT file3 or file4. Right now, because I restrict the bucket keys to prefix => ‘folder1/’, you still get file3 and 4 since they technically have the folder1 prefix.

It seems the only way to really do this is suck in all the keys under folder1 and then use string searching to actually exclude file3 and file4 from your results array.

Has anyone had experience doing this? I know FTP-style S3 clients like Transmit and Cyberduck must be doing this but it’s not apparent from the S3 API itself.

Thanks ahead,
Conrad

I’ve looked into both AWS::S3 and right_aws.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    The S3 API has no notion of a folder. It does, however, allow for filenames with “/” in them, and it allows you to query with a prefix. You seem to be familiar with that already, but just wanted to be clear.

    When you query with a prefix of folder1/, S3 is going to return everything under that “folder”. In order to manipulate only direct descendants, you are going to have to filter the results yourself in Ruby (pick your poison: reject or select). This isn’t going to help performance (a common reason to use “folders” in S3), but it gets the job done.

    • 0