Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6233023
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T10:13:26+00:00 2026-05-24T10:13:26+00:00

Has anyone seen this problem with IE ? IE opens up a new socket

  • 0

Has anyone seen this problem with IE ?

IE opens up a new socket for each of the new resources it loads in HTTPS , the problem is when the client is used for some time on IE with HTTPS these socets keeps accumulating and cause the webserver to choke till they are closed after some time

The following is the output of my webserver which increases overtime when the browser is being used for some time. And when browser is closed the sockets reduce .

root@localhost:~# netstat -taup | grep http
tcp        0      0 *:www                   *:*                     LISTEN     14427/webs_http.bin
tcp        0      0 *:https                 *:*                     LISTEN     14426/webs_https.bi
tcp        0      0 10.201.11.16:https      172.23.34.41:4181       TIME_WAIT  -
tcp        0      0 10.201.11.16:https      172.23.34.41:4183       TIME_WAIT  -
tcp        0      0 10.201.11.16:https      172.23.34.41:4182       TIME_WAIT  -
tcp        0      0 10.201.11.16:https      172.23.34.41:4179       TIME_WAIT  -
tcp        0      0 10.201.11.16:https      172.23.34.41:4180       TIME_WAIT  -
tcp        0      0 10.201.11.16:https      172.23.34.41:4187       TIME_WAIT  -
tcp        0      0 10.201.11.16:https      172.23.34.41:4184       TIME_WAIT  -
tcp        0      0 10.201.11.16:https      172.23.34.41:4186       TIME_WAIT  -
tcp        0      0 10.201.11.16:https      172.23.34.41:4188       TIME_WAIT  -
tcp        0      0 10.201.11.16:https      172.23.34.41:4185       TIME_WAIT  -

Other browsers like firefox/Chrome does not have this problem .

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T10:13:27+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 10:13 am

    Could this be the HTTPS keep-alive which many default Apache configurations attempt to defeat? I’m uncertain of this, but every Apache default configuration I’ve encountered in the last several years has included the following directive.

    Try adding this to the SSL/443 VirtualHost configuration (assuming this is an Apache server — not tagged specifically)

     SetEnvIf User-Agent ".*MSIE.*" \
        nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown \
        downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Has anyone seen this type of IE display problem? Example http://xs133.xs.to/xs133/08465/ie_problem910.jpg.xs.jpg Note that it
Has anyone seen this problem before? When I try to run the command heroku
Has anyone seen this problem? Is there a method I can call from my
Has anyone seen this before - and can anything be done about it? This
Has anyone seen this error when trying to call an external C function from
Has anyone seen this error when working with a PHP application out of dynamic
Has anyone seen this: ?? No jgem command works at all?? Though jruby -S
I don't know if anyone has seen this issue before but I'm just stumped.
Has anyone else seen people do this: private string _name; public string Name{ get{
Has anyone seen a good twin slider control for .Net (Win forms or WPF).

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.