Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7708933
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T00:44:16+00:00 2026-06-01T00:44:16+00:00

HashMap internally has its own static final variables for its working. static final int

  • 0

HashMap internally has its own static final variables for its working.

        static final int DEFAULT_INITIAL_CAPACITY = 16;

Why can’t they use byte datatype instead of using int since the value is too small.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T00:44:17+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 12:44 am

    Using byte or short for variables and constants instead of int is a premature optimization that has next to no effect.

    Most arithmetic and logical instructions of the JVM work only with int, long, float and double, other data types have to be cast to (usually) ints in order for these instructions to be executed on them.

    The default type of number literals is int for integral and double for floating point numbers. Using byte, short and float types can thus cause some subtle programming bugs and generally worsens code readability.

    A little example from the Java Puzzlers book:

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        for (byte b = Byte.MIN_VALUE; b < Byte.MAX_VALUE; b++) {
            if (b == 0x90)
                System.out.print("Joy!");
        }
    }
    

    This program doesn’t print Joy!, because the hex value 0x90 is implicitly promoted to an int with the value 144. Since bytes in Java are signed (which itself is very inconvenient), the variable b is never assigned to this value (Byte.MAX_VALUE = 127) and therefore, the condition is never satisfied.

    All in all, the reduction of the memory footprint is simply too small (next to none) to justify such micro-optimisation. Generally, explicit numeric types of different size are not necessary and suitable for higher level programming. I personally think that only case where smaller numeric types are acceptable are byte arrays.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

HashMap selections = new HashMap<Integer, Float>(); How can i get the Integer key of
I noticed that Netty has some internal Concurrent HashMap utilities. I'm curious why Netty
So, I'm trying to store HashMap on Android. I think it's better to use
Map testMap = new HashMap(); for(Map.Entry<String, Object> entry:testMap.entrySet()){ } it has error tip:Type mismatch:
HashMap model1 = wordobject.getMap(); Set sample = model1.keySet(); Iterator it = sample.iterator(); == Can
i use a hashmap to store some data, but i need to keep it
I have a HashMap having key as my own object and key as ArrayList
I know how hashmap works in Java. But I can't fully understand in C++.
I have a relatively complicated generic type (say Map<Long,Map<Integer,String>> ) which I use internally
I had a HashMap<Node, Double> in Java which I'd use later on to retrieve

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.