Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 64047
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T18:43:43+00:00 2026-05-10T18:43:43+00:00

Having a vector containing pointers to objects then using the clear function doesn’t call

  • 0

Having a vector containing pointers to objects then using the clear function doesn’t call the destructors for the objects in the vector. I made a function to do this manually but I don’t know how to make this a generic function for any kind of objects that might be in the vector.

void buttonVectorCleanup(vector<Button *> dVector){     Button* tmpClass;     for(int i = 0; i < (int)dVector.size(); i++){         tmpClass = dVector[i];          delete tmpClass;     } } 

This is the function I have that works fine for a specific type of object in the vector but I’d like a single function that could take any kind of vector with object pointers.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T18:43:43+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 6:43 pm

    The best thing to do is use smart pointers, such as from Boost. Then the objects will be deleted automatically.

    Or you can make a template function

    template <class T> void vectorCleanup(vector<T *>& dVector){     T* tmpClass;     for(vector<T*>::size_type i = 0; i < dVector.size(); i++){         tmpClass = dVector[i];          delete tmpClass;     } 

    }

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 124k
  • Answers 124k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Are you running on OS 3.0? I saw the same… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It looks like you need to register Apache::Session::Memcached with Apache::Session::Wrapper,… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use DATENAME or DATEPART: SELECT DATENAME(dw,GETDATE()) -- Friday SELECT DATEPART(dw,GETDATE())… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am

Related Questions

Having a vector containing pointers to objects then using the clear function doesn't call
Hi I'm pretty new to Stack Overflow so I hope that I'm doing this
I'm writing a hangman game. I'm having a logic fail, both with myself and
I'm writing a scanner as part of a compiler. I'm having a major headache
Recently, I was discussing with another programmer the best way to refactor a huge(1000

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.