Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9278965
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T17:30:46+00:00 2026-06-18T17:30:46+00:00

Having this: class User < ActiveRecord::Base after_save :execute_after_save def execute_after_save Kernel.puts Actual object still

  • 0

Having this:

class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  after_save :execute_after_save

  def execute_after_save
    Kernel.puts "Actual object still not saved" if changed?
  end
end

The Kernel.puts sentence should be called never because after the object is saved it is not changed.

1.9.3p286 :003 > u = User.create!(:name => "Wadus Name")
Actual object still not saved
 => #<User id: 1, name: "Wadus Name"> 
1.9.3p286 :004 > u.changed?
 => false 
1.9.3p286 :004 > u.name = "Other Name"
 => "Other Name" 
1.9.3p286 :005 > u.changed?
 => true 
1.9.3p286 :006 > u.save!
Actual object still not saved
 => true 
1.9.3p286 :007 > u.changed?
 => false 

See all the Actual object still not saved sentences that shouldn’t be there.

I was expecting that the after_save callback is actually called after the object is saved.

This situation is turning me crazy with some combinations of dirty objects and callbacks that I have to do.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T17:30:47+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 5:30 pm

    It’s after save but before commit.

    after_commit might be something you’re looking for.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Having a snippet like this: import yaml class User(object): def __init__(self, name, surname): self.name=
hey I'm having a little trouble with this function class User < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to
Having this: class Event < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :historizable, :polymorphic => true end user =
I have this model: class Location < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_gmappable def gmaps4rails_address #{self.city}, #{self.country} end
Having: class User < WsBasedPlainRubyObject def subscriptions Subscription.where(:user_id=>self.id) end [...] end class Subscription <
I've got the following User model: class User < ActiveRecord::Base # Users table has
I have the following models to associate users with roles: class User < ActiveRecord::Base
The title isn't very clear but I'll try to explain. Having this class: class
I've been having this bothering recurring theme; let's just say, I have a class
There are many classes having this provider suffix. (Data,membership,modelmetadata,...). When should be a class

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.